Talk:Hellcats over the Pacific

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (1 participant)
Midnight.works (1 participant)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (2 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (5 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

How to reference?[edit]

Much of the history section of this article is adapted from several lengthy e-mails between Eric Parker and myself in 2004. I was clear that the e-mails were going to be adapted into an article, which at the time I intended for my own web site, which is now static. I used the same materials to make this article instead.

So here's the question: how do you reference this? Some of the same topics were covered in another e-interview he gave in the late 1990s, so there is some overlapping confirmation, but given that the e-mails were sent to me personally, what should I do with them?

Maury (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In pure journalism they would just use the material. In this case, it seems that you aren't a journalist so can't use that reasoning. Did he acknowledge that he understood you were writing an article, or at least that you intended to publish to the www for public viewing? And if so did he say you could or could not put his comments into the website or article? If he did know and/or acknowledge it, then it seems to me that you are within a common understanding and you can publish. Danellicus (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was very clear in the first letter that I intended to write an article on the topic using the letters as material for direct inclusion. Also, this is not the only example, as I mentioned there is another similar interview in the references section that touches on some of the same history points. But the question is "how to publish"? Maury (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hellcats over the Pacific. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122191925/http://www.graphsim.com/company.html to http://www.graphsim.com/company.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]