Talk:Khitrovo Gospels

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Russia: Visual arts / Religion

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More elegant form of link spam[edit]

See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_11 and scroll down to the boxed-up entry for the European Library. The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors. It is possible that a side-mention of the Khitrovo Gospel might belong in one of our existing articles on Russian history. An entire article need not exist just to provide a repository for a single link to the European Library. EdJohnston 05:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The UNESCO Memory of the World Register states that "The manuscript has a great significance in the human written history of universal philosophy and culture.". I added the link and I will remove the deletion tag. Stammer 12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the prod as inappropriate. I commented vigourously at the time against the EL setting-up these un-wiki stubs, & reworked it a bit myself I think. It is now no worse than many Illuminated MS stubs, & the book is unquestionably notable. To say: "The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors" is just plain wrong. It should have an IM stub tag, btw. Johnbod 13:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gospels[edit]

A very welcome expansion & pic, but what are the contents? Is it just one Gospel, or should it be renamed to Khitrovo Gospels? Johnbod 15:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

read more carefully & moved. I renamed the redlink one on the assumption it has the set too. Johnbod 15:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khitrovo Gospels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221063024/http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/RussiaMoscow/treasures_en.xml to http://libraries.theeuropeanlibrary.org/RussiaMoscow/treasures_en.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]