Talk:List of composers by nationality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

Wow, this looks like it could be really great really fast. Yanksox 22:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Czech names[edit]

I had noticed that every name except Smetana's were written with diacritical marks (First name Bedřich)—with permission especially of the article's creator, I would like to change that and a few other minor changes. (Such as link dates of births and deaths to the articles about those years.) —CliffHarris (-T|C-) 17:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had copied each name from a different page in order to avoid retyping. Feel free to change anything you see necessary; also, I will look on some other pages to make sure this style is consistent (i.e. the lists by era: Classical, Romantic, etc.) Also, I would suggest only one link per year to be necessary; I have seen this done on other pages. Dafoeberezin3494 21:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bold?[edit]

Are only the names of major composers bolded? If so, Rachmaninov should also be—we wrote the 20th century's most famous piano concerto. —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-C|ε|L|T|♪-) 16:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The bolding of certain names is complete POV and should be deleted. Why is Ravel bolded and not Fauré? Why isn't Alban Berg bolded? Why is Johann Strauss bolded and not Schubert? The list is much too limitative. And there's not ONE single woman composer....Well, I'm going to add Tailleferre AND I'm going to bold her name. Musikfabrik 08:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • If we can come up with an objective reason for bolding names than I would like to keep it. Otherwise people are simply going to bold whoever their favorite composer is and the bold will have no meaning (as it seems right now). Also, when the list gets longer it makes it easier to navigate and find the most influential composers. I've got no ideas for an objective way to do this though. Any thoughts? Dafoeberezin3494 13:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Music history is completely subjective and based on such things as gender bias, nationalism, economic issues and personal tastes. There is no way to factor these issues out of the equation completely.
        • However, if this is a list of composers by nationality, then how these composers are seen in their nations should be one of approaching this. Clara Schumann used to be on the German 100 mark note, so obviously she has a certain importance for Germans. Germaine Tailleferre was on a postage stamp in France, received one of the first French government commissions and has streets and schools named after her in France. Both of these women have importance in these countries. Obviously, their names should be bold, if this is about composers relating to their nationalities. That's one way of looking at it, anyway. Musikfabrik 15:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Dead White Guys[edit]

I've added some more women and I've bolded some of the few people of color (notably Joplin - he wrote an pretty important opera.... and William Grant Still). This list needs to get to be more inclusive if it's to have any meaning. Although, I personally could do without the composer of the theme music from the Simpsons....

  • The information nuggets are all pretty useless too. You can't reduce a musical career into one line and make it have any meaning...Maybe all of the comments should be deleted, since pretty much everybody already knows that Pachebel wrote the Pachelbel Canon....Musikfabrik 09:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Without the annotations, the list becomes nothing better than a category. If we can standardize this as well, maybe by using only compositions or tablifying, again I'm not sure. But if we delete the annotations then we might as well delete the whole article because it will be the exact same as a category. Also, sorry if the list was mostly white men. Being a student of European classical music, that is who wrote most of the music. Dafoeberezin3494 13:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Being a scholar of European classical music, I can tell you catagorically that the reason that the names of dead white guys keep coming up is not because women and people of other cultures didn't write important music, it's because the scholarship is slanted that way. If you start scratching the surface, the reality is extremely different. The Fondation Adkins-Chiti Donne in Musica in Rome [1] has a library of over 10,000 works and having contributed some of them through my scholarship, I can tell you that there are some masterpieces there. There are other archives around the World that have holding for people of all cultures. The trend these days is towards opening music scholarship towards a rethinking of the "Dead White Men" position and reassessing the position of European art music in the World Music Tradition. I'm not saying that we should ax all the Germans on the list: I'm simply saying that there should be room for composers from Azerbaidjan (one of my specialities), Korea, Canada (Violet Archer, for example....), Mexico, Cuba and other places like that. YOU might not know who they are, but there ARE important composers (some of them women) from these places who have become major national figures. It seems to me that the job of an encyclopedia is to document this information.
    • As it stands, most of the information here simply falls into the catagory of "information nuggets". While they might provoke enough interest for someone to click a link and find out more, they have no real meaning other than being the information that one is "supposed to know" about these people. None of them add anything really to the page, so perhaps it is not terribly useful? Musikfabrik 13:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of Composer[edit]

  • Merriam-Webster = [2]

one that composes; especially : a person who writes music

  • Cambridge Dictionary of American English = [3] A person who writes music

There is no distinction bectween the person writing and what is written. So, someone who writes symphonies and someone who writes songs are both composers.

  • That said, if Britney doesn't have a place on this list, then why does Cole Porter, Irving Berlin (who only wrote songs), Danny Elfman, Frank Zappa etc? Is it because she's a woman?
  • Rethinking hierarchies such as "Classical" verses "popular", redefining gender bias and looking to describe things without making value judgements are all part of the encylopedic process. Isn't saying that Britney isn't as good a composer as, for example, Danny Elfman creating a hierarchy and expressing a non-neutral point of view? Since more people listen to Britney than listen to Arnold Schoenberg, doesn't she have cultural importance strictly from the amount of listeners she has?
  • The point that this entry makes is that the idea of "composer" is not the property of the classical musical establishment and popular artists such as Spears can be thought of as "composers" according to the dictionary definition of the word. Musikfabrik 08:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty obvious that in normal usage, "composer" is short for "classical music composer" and "song writer" is used for the composers of popular modern music. I think it's quite silly that every entry on this list repeats the word "composer" in the description for each person, too. :) It's not a very useful list.--Danny Rathjens 20:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albinoni[edit]

I see the list of Italian composers is a long one. Still I think Albinoni deserves a spot on the main list, as his Adagio is very famous. 88.90.82.166 17:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuba?[edit]

I was just wondering why there aren't any Cuban composers on this list. Antonio Machín, Beny Moré, Ernesto Lecuona, Leo Brouwer, Silvio Rodriguez or Pablo Milanés would be good representatives. 148.240.106.164 21:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not good at all! Japanese composers, Takemitsu for starter, but I was looking for another, wikipedia has disappointed me today!!No doubt I will have disappointed others by typing here !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.240.144 (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is GB split up?[edit]

GB is split up into entities like England and Scotland, but more federal countries like the US are not. I have great affinity for Scotland, but unless we bear flags for each Australian state, Chinese province, Mexican estado, and Russian oblast, etc. it is simply unequal to divide up only GB. Readers that need to know whether a particular composer was Scottish or English may follow the composer's link to do so. BTW, if we divided up every UN member state or similar, we should include the Northern Irish, and probably the Cornish, the Manx, and the Welsh. :)--Thecurran (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Bach[edit]

As the list stands now, with most of the major nations, like Germany, split off, and not linked, there is no Beethoven, Bach or Brahms. This is a list of composers, which is missing all the major composers! As it stands, this is a bit useless.87.113.61.208 (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alsace[edit]

There is an Alsatian nationality living in Alsace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rendes Kis (talk • contribs) 17:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Thanks to SineBot for signing my previous post) --Rendes Kis (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rendes Kis. If you had read the sources you are referring me to, you would have noticed that there is no mention at all of an Alsatian nationality. Alsace is a region in France, and a département. Just like there is no Breton or Auvergnian or Provençal nationality. The nationality of Alsatian people and of every other region in France is French. Full stop. – Aklein62 (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aklein62, France is not an ethnically homogeneous country.
There are several nationalities living in it: the Breton, the Provençal, the Alsatian, etc..
Please, visit the German article about Jean-Frédéric (Johann Friedrich) Edelmann.
Thank you in advance. --Rendes Kis (talk) 08:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. It looks like we will not find an agreement here. What defines a nation is an age-old debate, and there is no common definition.
1. I know that France is not a homogeneous nation. No nation is. But where do you want to begin and end? Do we really want to break down each composer's nationality to the region he came from? Would you do the same for Bavarians, Westphalians and Lower Saxons in Germany, for Venetians and Sicilians in Italy, for Californians and Texans in the US? Once you start you would have to do it everywhere. And in many cases you would not do the people in question any justice because they may not want to be put in such a small category.
2. The link to the French map you sent me says nothing whatsoever about nationality. Have a look at it. Is speaks of regions and languages, not of nationalities, and rightly so.
3. The German article on the composer Edelmann is imprecise when it says he is Alsatian. It should read 'he was a French composer from Alsace'.
4. A potential reason for our disagreement is that the term nationality means something else for (some) English-speaking people. See the WP article on Nationality, it says "In English and some other languages, the word nationality is sometimes used to refer to an ethnic group (a group of people who share a common ethnic identity, language, culture, descent, history, and so forth). This meaning of nationality is not defined by political borders or passport ownership and includes nations that lack an independent state [...]". But we should not do that on Wikipedia, because the consequences would be never-ending.
In short, please refrain from opening up a section 'Alsatian' in this list. Please. – Aklein62 (talk) 10:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are 2 significantly different approaches of the nationality problem: from the point of view of the winners and of the losers.
The English, the French, the Spanish, the Italian are the current winners, the Scottish, the Alsatian, the Catalonian, the Sicilian are the current losers.
I don't think the current state is good enough to be maintained forever.
I think the yesterday's losers have to get the chance for preserving their local identity (language, culture, nationality). --Rendes Kis (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Aklein62, as I see you are from Germany.
Now I think it's clear to me why you are against recording the Alsatian identity: you want to forget about the painful history of the wars between France and Germany.
I can understand that, but I think it is an overcompensation.
I think it would be better to encourage the Alsatian identity rather than to suppress it. --Rendes Kis (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think Alsace is a region of France having a particular local identity (i.e. nationalty).
Wow. Now stop it, will you? What you are saying there comes close to an insult. My own nationality has nothing to do with what I said. I would have argued the same way if you had proposed a Bavarian nationality or any other region in Germany. I thought I had made that clear. If you knew me better you would know that I am deeply anti-nationalistic and anti-religious because these are two root causes of human conflict. I have no objections to an Alsatian identity or any other regional identity. Just don't talk about nationality here. But – you know what, do what you like. I don't care anymore now. Put in your Alsatian nationality (but don't forget all the others) and don't bother me anymore. – Aklein62 (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Aklein62, I don't want to insult you.
I just would like to ask you for being anti-nationalistic in the correct way: to be against the German and the French nationalism as well.
If you agree with me in doing so, please, undelete the Alsace entry in the list.
Thank you in advance. --Rendes Kis (talk) 06:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of composers by nationality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so no Germany, no Bach, no Austria, no Mozart...[edit]

What the f... is this then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.246.71.122 (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_composers_by_nationality&oldid=1206765498"