Talk:List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured list candidate |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Story mode
[edit]Let it be was not on this game. I removed it and then it told me it reverted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.189.93 (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- LET IT BE is not in this game. DIG A PONY is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.51.235 (talk) 21:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I believe there should be a modification in the graph of on-disc songs that can display the order of the songs as they are played in story mode. Agreed? MaJic Talk 2 Me. I'll Listen. 21:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- If you click on the icon next to the title of the "Venue" column, the table will sort into the order presented in Story mode. --MASEM (t) 21:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. Well, I thought that just alphabetized them. thanks. MaJic Talk 2 Me. I'll Listen. 21:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's no "order" in Story Mode. You go through different venues but can beat the songs in whatever order you want. -- TRTX T / C 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, there is actually, as you can only access tiers you've completed before you can move onto the next one the first time through a story mode. Once you've done that, you can select whatever song at any time. --MASEM (t) 23:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's no "order" in Story Mode. You go through different venues but can beat the songs in whatever order you want. -- TRTX T / C 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Quickplay?
[edit]I was wondering can you play the songs in quickplay only,or can you play it in story mode to. i have an xbox,but i onely played all you need is love on quickplay so far. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.68.227.69 (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
We should refactor the table...
[edit]It's a bit complicated... I'm thinking we should have a table for each album (since this is a finite set of songs comparred to standard RB. Each table/section would include pricing of individual singles and multi-song packs. As well as the price for the "Complete the Album" pack. -- TRTX T / C 20:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- I believe, based on length, they are only doing the track combination due to length and connectivity on Abbey Road; I don't expect to see this on Sgt. Peppers or Rubber Soul. Also, we need avoid making this a buyer's guide - we need to focus on what songs are in the game, not so heavily on how they can be bought.
- That said, I think what we should do is still break out each song, and then footnote that the songs are only available as a set of 2/3 with the matching footnote marker, so that each song is still sortable. This also should be done for "Sgt. Peppers" and "With a Little Help" so that both songs track. (not so much the Love remix as that's not two separate songs). --MASEM (t) 20:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'd disagree with that. The point is that the combined track IS the game track; to represent in any other way is a misrepresentation of how the tracks appear during gameplay. The split isn't due to length (Her Majesty is only about 30 seconds long), but more likely due to the fact that the songs don't work unless they segue into the next (like SPLHCB/WALHFMF). My view is that the table should be left as is. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Remember that we're not here to provide an article for gamers - we are here to provide an article for general readers. We want to indicate what songs are in the game, and while we want to try to help explain that some songs are not playable by themselves but as part of a 2/3 grouping, that information is of little use to the general reader, which is why we can footnote it without a problem. If we focus too much on the gamer aspects of these lists, we run in danger of this being a game guide and deletable. --MASEM (t) 14:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think that whichever way you format the table, it could be seen as an article for gamers by someone (or an article for Beatles fans by someone too). Although I understand the point of having the table sortable, in order to be an article for general readers, shouldn't the information be representative of how it is shown in secondary sources, and in-game? I don't have a strong objection to your proposed change, but don't think that it's necessarily the correct way of presenting the information, which seems perfectly serviceable in its present format. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Either way right now is ok, as there's a minimum of songs to sort through, and someone looking to see if, say, "Carry That Weight" is included should be able to find it easily. If there is significantly more DLC (as there is for the RB series) that comes out later, and/or if that includes more DLC with combined tracks (which I don't think will happen, there's nothing else like the Medley in other albums) then we might reassess. --MASEM (t) 16:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think that whichever way you format the table, it could be seen as an article for gamers by someone (or an article for Beatles fans by someone too). Although I understand the point of having the table sortable, in order to be an article for general readers, shouldn't the information be representative of how it is shown in secondary sources, and in-game? I don't have a strong objection to your proposed change, but don't think that it's necessarily the correct way of presenting the information, which seems perfectly serviceable in its present format. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Remember that we're not here to provide an article for gamers - we are here to provide an article for general readers. We want to indicate what songs are in the game, and while we want to try to help explain that some songs are not playable by themselves but as part of a 2/3 grouping, that information is of little use to the general reader, which is why we can footnote it without a problem. If we focus too much on the gamer aspects of these lists, we run in danger of this being a game guide and deletable. --MASEM (t) 14:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'd disagree with that. The point is that the combined track IS the game track; to represent in any other way is a misrepresentation of how the tracks appear during gameplay. The split isn't due to length (Her Majesty is only about 30 seconds long), but more likely due to the fact that the songs don't work unless they segue into the next (like SPLHCB/WALHFMF). My view is that the table should be left as is. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
←Other things to consider.
- On 360/PS3, only "Beacuse", "Oh! Darling", and "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" are available as singles.
- On 360/PS3, all other songs are only included with the album.
- The Medley is only available on 360/PS3.
- The seperate chunks of the medley are only available for purchase on Wii.
These are things that should be documented somehow, but I'm not sure how to word footnotes. I will make a few edits, feel free to revert/edit with your own thoughts. -- TRTX T / C 21:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I Me Mine
[edit]I think this page should mention that the version of I Me Mine on the game is the one from Let It Be...Naked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.211.137.148 (talk) 19:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's not. It's from Let It Be. They are the same version anyway. McLerristarr (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band release date
[edit]Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band will be available Nov. 17th.
Look in the second box down on the right at www.dlcquickplay.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.9.9.23 (talk) 23:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Not a reliable source. We will probably know, officially, when the regular RB DLC announcements are made. --MASEM (t) 23:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Revolver DLC Infomation
[edit]"Eleanor Rigby" Revolver 1 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "I'm Only Sleeping" Revolver 2 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Love You To" Revolver 3 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Here, There and Everywhere" Revolver 4 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "She Said She Said" Revolver 5 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Budokan 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Good Day Sunshine" Revolver 6 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "For No One" Revolver 7 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Doctor Robert" Revolver 8 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Budokan 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "I Want to Tell You" Revolver 9 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Budokan 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Got to Get You into My Life" Revolver 10 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 "Tomorrow Never Knows" Revolver 11 Revolver 1966-8-05 1966 Abbey Road Studios 2010-2-23 23 February 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.169.81 (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a source for this? I can't find anything about it. I think it's most likely made up or a mistake. McLerristarr (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Well There Are Rumors... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.169.81 (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Rumors are not a source. -- TRTX T / C 23:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Looks Likes Revolver Will Be Released Sometime In 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.249.5 (talk) 12:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a source for that? Nothing from HMX that I can find. --MASEM (t) 14:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/music/chi-tc-arts-beatles-rock-band-09sep06%2C0%2C1589151.story
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090627125423/http://www.crispygamer.com/interviews/2009-06-24/you-say-you-want-a-revolution-chris-foster-on-the-beatles-rock-band.aspx to http://www.crispygamer.com/interviews/2009-06-24/you-say-you-want-a-revolution-chris-foster-on-the-beatles-rock-band.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005011045/http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3012110 to http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3012110
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090823013038/http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158588 to http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158588
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091020134156/http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/103/1036007p1.html to http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/103/1036007p1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100215082329/http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182886 to http://www.rockband.com/forums/showthread.php?t=182886
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured list candidates (contested)
- List-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- Video game articles requesting screenshots
- WikiProject Video games articles
- List-Class song articles
- List-Class The Beatles articles
- Low-importance The Beatles articles
- WikiProject The Beatles articles