Talk:M. J. Thirumalachar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. J. Thirumalachar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Second page was 404 d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 16:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:M. J. Thirumalachar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 09:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I propose to take on this review. I will read the article in detail shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First reading[edit]

  • "M. J. Thirumalachar was born ..." - Could you clarify, or split this sentence. It is currently unclear to which of his parents the second half refers. Done
  • "He served out his regular career at HAL, superannuating as the superintendent of research in 1975." - This is a bit technical, and if you are going to use the acronym HAL, I think you should introduce it in the previous sentence.  Done
  • What on earth was he doing in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota Medical School? Doesn't sound likely at all and I can't see the pediatrics bit in the cited sources.  Done added citations, expanded sentence --jojo@nthony (talk) 06:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikilink: peptaibol, Emericellopsis (needs italics too), chemotherapeutants  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are a number of places in the article where I would include the definite article "the" in places where Indian English does not seem to think it necessary. NOTED --jojo@nthony (talk) 06:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking back at the lead, now that I have read the whole article, I see a number of citations in this section. It should not be necessary to have any citations in the lead, because it is supposed to be a summary of the main body of text, where all important facts should be cited. In this instance there is information in the lead on antifungal antibiotics that is not present elsewhere in the article.  Done citations moved to the body of the article. --jojo@nthony (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cwmhiraeth: changes made as per assessment. --jojo@nthony (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

  • The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout.
  • The article uses many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research. There is a lack of consistency among the citations. The authors should be listed consistently, preferably with the surname first; #46 needs to be in lower case; "p." should be used for a single page and "pp." where there is a range; date formatting should be uniform.  Done--jojo@nthony (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's better.
  • The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
  • The article is neutral.
  • The article is stable.
  • The images are relevant and are suitably licensed. The caption of the dead fly image could explain why it is relevant to the article.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 05:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's better.
  • @Cwmhiraeth: changes made as per comments.--jojo@nthony (talk) 05:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M. J. Thirumalachar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:M._J._Thirumalachar&oldid=1209965882"