Talk:MV Francop

Split Proposal

I think the article should be split for MV FRANCOP itself and operation "Four Species".

International reaction in the article about cargo ship looks funny. Shmuliko (talk) 06:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I think that MV FRANCOP is not notable except in context of the operation, therefore I suggest merging this article into Operation "Four Species".Marokwitz (talk) 07:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This of course should be merged into the Operation Four Species article. This random freighter in notable except in the context of the operation.ShamWow (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, Merge.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Legal Basis

Is there any information on what legal basis Israel seized this ship outside of their territorial waters? Wefa (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This is not a forum. Though this info about illegal weapons trafficking, by Iran, should be inserted into either of the articles. --Shuki (talk) 18:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm quite aware of that. Nonetheless information like that should be in the article, if there are reliable sources for it. I looked for it myself but didn't find any - so instead of dropping the matter I simply asked here. Anybody seen any kind of article or quotable explanantion on what law Israel based this raid? Wefa (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Gruby byl kiedys

What does "Gruby byl kiedys na tym statku ale nei znalazl broni bo jest pipa nie komandos." mean? --Smoggyrob | Talk 01:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

article about ship not the affair, cats should be removed

Keeping the cats is making this article redundant. As it is the 'Boarding incident' section should be cut to the lead paragraph, there is a main article about the affair. --Shuki (talk) 18:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MV Francop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110506234851/http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/News/today/09/11/0505.htm to http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/News/today/09/11/0505.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)