Talk:Mike Chang

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Glee task force (assessed as High-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Mike Chang. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Chang (Glee) → Mike Chang – No other article named 'Mike Chang' exists, thus per the WP:TV-NC guideline, a disambiguated title is not required. I have attempted to approach the editor who moved the article ([1]), but my messages were deleted without response ([2]). Frickative 17:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. Jenks24 (talk) 19:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. An administrator has reversed four other inappropriate renames by the same editor the same day and the day before. If there's any way this can be reversed sooner than seven days, it would be ideal. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As above. Once moved back, can it be move-protected so that this doesn't happen again? Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 19:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Mike Chang the fitness blogger also shows up prominently in the Google results. But even after someone writes an article about him, that would be a WP:TWODABS situation rather than a reason to disambiguate this title. Kauffner (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above CTJF83 12:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Source material for Development section[edit]

Interview with Harry Shum, Jr. on Mike Chang with Starry Constellation Magazine, from October 2011 (right before "Asian F"): http://starrymag.com/content.asp?ID=6221&CATEGORY=Interviews&PAGE=12
— BlueMoonset (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mike Chang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]