Talk:Opus Sanctorum Angelorum

Catholicism Low‑importance

Opus Sanctorum Angelorum is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

NPOV[edit]

The current article portrays this organization in such a favorable light that it seems to me to be a candidate for an NPOV rewrite. -- Chronulator (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you would indicate concretely what, if anything, you consider to be unsourced or unbalanced in the article as it stands. With reliable citations, the article reports how controversy about the association caused it to be subjected to examination by the Holy See, that the Holy See expressed strictures with regard to it and suggested remedies, and that after implementation of those remedies it gave official approval to the association. If you want the article to present also a view different from the Holy See's, it is up to you to add that other view to the article, not of course on the basis of your own personal opinion, but by citing reliable sources for it. Objective evidence of lack of a neutral point of view has not been presented. Esoglou (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2011

What I have found out so far about this organization, The present article is a very good summary. The article is objective as far as reliable and trustworthy sources are available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.174.23 (talk • contribs)

Please watch this article[edit]

In July 2019 there were some edits that contradicted all given sources. I have restored the last bot version in line with the facts, anybody who understands Portuguese or German can check the sources. Please have an eye on future edits. Thank you and best regards, Agathenon (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]