Talk:Pamir Airways Flight 112

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Map co-ordinates[edit]

The map and Map co-ordinates were borrowed from the Salang Pass article. Therefore I can't guarantee them, though they seem correct. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot nationality?[edit]

On the nationalities section, the crew of 5 come under Aghan, but when I was researching on the crash I found this ([1]). It states the pilot of the plane was a Russian-Tajik national, not Afghan. Help? Zaps93 (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows. This is fairly typical that lot of contradictory (or BS) information wafts around. Some later reports (FRIDAY, MAY 21, 2010 1:04 am) HERE say 44 on board, most said 43! 6 crew? --220.101.28.25 (talk) 08:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that there were 44 on board. We should go with the majority reports of 43 until 44 is definitively confirmed. Can anyone find a ref for two Pakistanis on board. This was added by an IP editor (62.192.140.30 (talk · contribs)). Mjroots (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've answered that yourself, Mjroots as events have overtaken us here! (another IP said they were 2 Turks) The number of 'foreigners' aboard has also increased 6 ↑ 8. including an Ozzie, as you now know. What we need is a miraculous survival to get to the front page, as the page views for this article are very poor. (Not that that's my motivation!) --220.101.28.25 (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then again perhaps not! --220.101.28.25 (talk) 13:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australians[edit]

ive changed the number of austrlaians on the flights to zero and added reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.220.188 (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flight 112 or Flight 1102?[edit]

Some sources such as ASN refer to it as Flight 1102 whereas others such as the Aviation Herald refer to it as Flight 112. Which one is correct? KlientNo.1 (talk) 12:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]