Talk:Paul Hunter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidatePaul Hunter is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articlePaul Hunter has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 2, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
July 3, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 16, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Requested move 26 March 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 20:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Hunter → Paul Hunter (snooker player) – There are 6 different Paul Hunters on Wikipedia, one of which, Paul Hunter (director), is a popular music video director that has worked with Justin Timberlake, Madonna and J. Lo. I don't see why this Paul Hunter has to be the primary one for the name. I think the name should be changed to help with any confusion and that "Paul Hunter" redirect to the disambiguation page. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Picture?[edit]

Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to get a picture for this article? Not least given that Hunter was so well-known for his looks? Brooklyn Eagle (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking to ask the same thing. The hideous image currently here may be of Paul Hunter, or it may be an outtake from some 1930s horror film. For God's sake, someone put up a decent picture of this man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.110.242.175 (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Paul Hunter (snooker player). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And a man known for his good looks, a man who could have been cast as an excellent Vampire Lestat, gets a posthumous-looking pic that makes him look more like Nosferatu. Come on, we can do better! http://www.pix123.com/livesnooker/NewsImages/473980_2948403.jpg Steve Rapaport (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead image[edit]

Please can someone try to get hold of a free use image that we can use for this article? I can't believe there isn't a photo of Paul somewhere out there that can't be licensed for use in Commons. The one we're using at the moment is a portrait derived from an etching on a trophy and it doesn't even look remotely like Hunter! As it's a representative image, rather than an actual picture of the subject of the article, it doesn't provide "visual confirmation" and could therefore be misleading. The reader might question whether they've arrived at the correct article. See MOS:LEADIMAGE. In my view, we shouldn't really be using this image and the best solution might be to go back to not having a lead image at all. Rodney Baggins (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And I just realised this image was added a few weeks ago by an unregistered IP but no-one questioned it at the time. Rodney Baggins (talk) 07:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Baggins - there is a possibility for NfCC images here. As the article is no longer a BLP, we could get away with adding an image such as we did at Bill Werbeniuk Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:07, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski, thanks Lee, I'd completely forgotten about this! I agree with what you're saying, according to Wikipedia:FUC, it should be OK as there is no free equivalent available (point 1 in Policy section). Question is, where can we get an image from? What about nicking this from the Polish wiki? [1] Cheers, Rodney Baggins (talk) 09:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski, hello again. Going back through the page revisions, the image in this version is the one I suggested above, but was removed by User:Aloeicious who called it a "poor photo"...? It's in commons: [2] Rodney Baggins (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, just re-add it. If there is a free image, FUR no longer counts. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 April 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria in the Supports. The Opposes reference no policy or guidelines, and number of other topics is not a criterion. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– The WP: PRIMARYTOPIC. The director has a lot of notability, but doesn't even get close to the amount of hits as the snooker player. Despite not being world number one, or a world champion, 3 Masters titles suggest he is a well known snooker player. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC #2. Long-term page views for all DAB entries show the snooker player gets a clear majority of views, even excluding the sometimes dramatic spikes. (A logarithmic scale shows this more clearly.) 94.21.253.28 (talk) 05:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per now.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per arguments by User:BD2412 and User:GregKaye in the above Talk:Paul Hunter (snooker player)#Requested move 26 March 2015. Nothing has changed — "Paul Hunter" is a very common name and there are now eight entries at the disambiguation page, rather than the seven of 2015. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 14:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The previous RM was flawed in that it suggested that because we have a lot of articles with the same name, we therefore cannot have a primary topic. See John Higgins a significantly more common name, with far more articles, but the snooker play is clearly the primary topic. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the outcome of the previous discussion. The spikes are outliers, and the narrower ones could just as easily be the result of machine-generated searches as human interest. Let's be honest here, snooker is generally not one of the most publicized sports. BD2412 T 15:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that could be considered true. A quick Google search for Paul Hunter brings up almost exclusive hits for the snooker player. Over a prolonged history the article gets a significant amount more traffic than the rest of the articles. Snooker is perfectly well publicised. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is it really, though? BD2412 T 16:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How has snooker's publicity got anything to do with whether this person is the primary topic? 62.165.227.49 (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Not universally well-known enough to be primary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose this primarytopic grab. Disambiguation is good. Dicklyon (talk) 04:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Flags discussion[edit]

There is a conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker/Archives/2020/May#Second attack of the flags regarding the use of flags on snooker biographies that may be of interest. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Hunter&oldid=1207672029"