This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:14, May 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
I have concerns about the article name. The vessel was most (16 of 25 years) of its career named Seisho Maru, and the most dominant part of the history section is attributed to this period of the ships life. My interpretation of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) says change to the Japanese name, but I am willing to forfeit this claim is a compelling reason for the naming choice is given.
Looking at the facts as you presented them, I can see that is correct, and have moved it to Seisho Maru. Thanks for catching that. — Bellhalla (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
I would like an explanation as to the naming choice before I pass the article—otherwise there is nothing to point to. Arsenikk(talk) 15:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply, and congratulations with a Good Article. Now I just have a mess since you moved the article in the middle of the review ;) Arsenikk(talk) 16:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, and sorry about the mess. :) — Bellhalla (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I like a challenge—and all I needed to do was move the review page ;) Arsenikk(talk) 18:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus(talk) 18:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
MV Seisho Maru → Seisho Maru – Move over redirect to original name. No discussion about the move to the current name. No discussion or documentation in article regarding any conversion of the ship's powerplant from steam to motor (which would imply an "SS" prefix, not an "MV" prefix). But, ship prefix use on Japanese ships is a bit of a gray area. From article sources easily examined, none use a prefix of any kind. 72.181.4.105 (talk) 14:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg)
b (MoS): 
