Talk:Silicon Forest

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon High‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article was a Collaboration of the Week/Month for WikiProject Oregon April 20–May 5, 2008.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Oregon or Washington (state) may be able to help!

Sources for expansion/citations

Rogoway, Mike and Ted Sickinger. Silicon Forest is stunted The Oregonian, April 9 2006. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portland startups

The article links to the redlinked Portland startups, but there is no history of the article ever existing and no discussion anywhere that I have looked. The use is A list of Portland tech startups (technology companies founded in Portland) is provided separately.{{Expand list|date=March 2012}}

I imagine this is intended to be mostly a list article than a detailed description of what is unique about startups in Portland, but it would have been nice if the creator of the link provided some guidance by establishing a stub with some sort of format. 29 editors are watching this page, so maybe someone will chime in? —EncMstr (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I too noticed the reference to a list of Portland tech startups "provided separately" that doesn't appear to exist. And since this list already has quite a few Portland tech companies, maybe we should just delete that sentence? I was tempted to do so but am new here. ThomasServo18 (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Silicon Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101030033439/http://www.industryweek.com/articles/portland_cultivates_future_as_hub_for_manufacturing_alternative_energy_22925.aspx to http://www.industryweek.com/articles/portland_cultivates_future_as_hub_for_manufacturing_alternative_energy_22925.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]