Talk:Street Fighter (1994 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Street Fighter (1994 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strange phrasing[edit]

I removed this bit which was the last line of the lede.

An intended reboot, Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li, was released in 2009 to critical and commercial failure.

While factually true, I'm not sure whether Legend of Chun Li's critical and commercial failure is really relevant to the informational content of this article (as it's mentioned in the lede of said movie's own article). Also, any movie released 15 years apart yet somehow part of the same franchise is practically guaranteed to be a reboot, even though I know there have been exceptions to the rule. It's rather the word "intended" which puzzles me. When is a reboot "unintentional"? I changed the wording in the article accordingly. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archived![edit]

Forgot to write it in the edit summary. Sorry! --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 06:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Retrospective[edit]

Twenty-four years later The Guardian has a detailed retrospective:

There is a lot of information that could be used to improve this Wikipedia article. The retrospective includes interview comments from the Director, crew, and cast. It gives an overview of the tight schedule, the casting difficulties, location difficulties, Van Damme difficulties, MPAA difficulties, etc. etc. The article notes (despite or irrespective of all difficulties) the film was a commercial success, and gives a critical reappraisal: "‘With hindsight, Street Fighter: The Movie is a charmingly camp and self-consciously silly action flick", and the direct gets the last word: "How can you see that movie and think it’s funny by accident?"

I'd make changes myself only the article is locked for reasons unclear. -- 37.110.218.43 (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still locked, still not being improved. -- 109.79.168.130 (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2020[edit]

"De Souza agreed, however plans were switched once it was learned the Raúl Juliá was suffering from cancer.[8] Initially plans were to shoot Juliá's less intensive scenes first while the rest of the cast would train with Picerni, however upon seeing Juliá, de Souza realized that they could not show him in his current weakened state and was forced to switch the filming around."

"learned the" is a typo for "learned that".

Personally I would change both ", however " to "; however, ". 2001:8B0:BB7B:4008:21F:F3FF:FEBF:5041 (talk) 18:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you! GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]