Talk:Trondheim Central Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTrondheim Central Station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2008.

Tram lines[edit]

In the 60's, only the Singsaker tram line (3) served Trondheim Central Station. The Elgeseter line (2) went to Lade. Jon kare (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trondheim Central Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA On Hold[edit]

This article has been placed on hold, because a few minor changes are needed. Generally, all the information about the station is present, written well and well refereces. A copyedit was needed as the english was incorrect in places. I also re-ordered sections of the article as I felt it would flow better.

The section "Dovrebanen arrives" needs some expansion. The first sentence talks of a competition to re-deisgn the station. It does not state who won the competion, or why, or much about their winning design. I feel that this lack of information about the archetecture is quite a gap since that section of the article is about the redesign of the station.

This article will be watched for seven days, and if no siginificant improvement is made may be failed without notice. Please feel free to ask me questions here or on my talk page. Good luck! Million_Moments (talk)

Please leave me a note here when you feel you have completed the changes I have asked so that I can review the article again. Million_Moments (talk) 12:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review and the copyedit. I believe I have addressed your comments—it was necessary to dig up some more sources so I apologies for the excessive time for the edits. I have not been able to establish who won the 1910 competition, but the implications of the design have been described in greater detail. If this is not sufficient for you, I am more than happy to look more, but a fear it would be fruitless without OR (digging up city archives). There is also a section on architecture in place. Again, thanks for the review, polish and comments. Arsenikk (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass[edit]

I am very happy to pass this article to GA status. Before the hold process, the article was pretty close to being GA and the work done during the hold has improved it more than I expected! Well done. Normally I would not find an article about a railway station interesting but the clear and concise nature of thi article means it is worth while reading. Part of the GA process is to suggest future improvements, and obviously if you are able to find out who won the competition (I understand how difficult that might be) and any other encylopedic information it should be done. Some of the paragraphs are quite long with the refereces for the entire paragraph at it's end. Referecnes only actually need to be given after statements that may be contested and direct quotes, but where a paragraph maybe talking about two seperate things under the same reference it maybe advisible to use that reference internally. For example, the annoucement that there would be two stations, and the fact that this was protested about by the public and brought to court are related enough to be in the same paragraph, but they do not necessarily sound like they would have the same reference.

Congratulations, and keep up the good work! Million_Moments (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Arsenikk (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two stations[edit]

I corrected some errors in the beginning of the article, but see now that some of the same stuff is located further down under "two stations". This should be combined, but I have no time to look into that right now, but will return in due time. --Sveins (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the errors. I have merged your additional content into the main text body, and shortened down the lead somewhat. This is because the leads in Wikipedia articles are supposed to summarize all parts of the article, and not contain too much detail (see WP:LEAD for more on this). Thanks for taking an interest in making Wikipedia a better encyclopedia—your contributions or rail transport in Norway are highly appreciated. Arsenikk (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Construction works[edit]

The station is currently (2011) undergoing major alterations due to the urban renewal of the entire "island". A section about this is most definetely needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.113.66.145 (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Trondheim Central Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Trondheim Central Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trondheim Central Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vy should be removed[edit]

That VY operates from this station should be removed as it no longer does. Norwegian article about the subject: https://www.nrk.no/trondelag/sj-norge-far-kontrakter-i-togtrafikken-1.14591292. Norwegian Wikiepdia page https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/SJ_Norge where it states that SJ Norge, not vy operates the train lines from the station. Anyone disagree? Alex1611 (talk) 21:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Trondheim_Central_Station&oldid=1210760508"