Talk:XGP

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Kelly Metzger (2 participants)
David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (8 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (8 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Super Mutant (12 participants)
Police Trainer (2 participants; relisted)
Beam Invader (5 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (4 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (12 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (3 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Pants[edit]

Omg, I would pants myself for a hackable OpenGL-ES System.

The XGP was redesigned, more Infos here --134.93.56.61 02:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No 3D for micro[edit]

A follow up post at EDGE says that the XGP micro will not have the 3D GPU, contrary to the info on this article:

http://www.edge-online.co.uk/archives/2006/03/gamepark_goes_m_1.php

Which is right?

---

The xgp mini will have a 3d chip, at least it's mentioned in the e3 trailer:

http://www.korea-e3.com/img/movie/gamepark.mpg

---

The official site states that the mini will have 3d. http://gamepark.com/xgpmini.htm

Clean up[edit]

Just the reading the first sections makes me thinkthat whoever who this doesn't speak english. I'm going to try to fix things as Ifind them, but someone really needs to clean this article up. The redundancy of this article is insane.

--

You don't seem to speak English very well either :p

Memory[edit]

Is the memory size stated in 10⁶ byte units or mebibyte?

Site disrepair[edit]

Images are being deleted soon if they're not replaced (by what, I don't know). Also these products seem to be bordering on vaporware. Is there any news on these things at all? --Thaddius 15:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GP is down now ! So... no more XGP planned I think. Draky 14:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bankruptcy[edit]

Whoa , whoa whoa.

"On March 8, 2007 it was announced that Gamepark declared bankruptcy (source: [1] )so it seems unlikely that any of the XGP models will be released."

Is there any more information to be found on this subject besides that source? http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pockett.net%2Fnews.php%3Fid%3D2508&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools The article seems to be French in origin and put through an online translator. What we have left is a barely understandable mess. JyL 19:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky for us the French language itself is far from an 'unrecognizable mess'. The original article does say that the company is out of business due to the recent change in the official website (it no longer existing). My French is rusty, but it's my understanding that the article mentions that GP (not GP Holdings) did in fact declare bankruptcy at the end of 2006, but does not back it up in any way. Whoever ran it through a translator may have extrapolated from that garbage. Never use online translators, especially to translate sources. --Thaddius 06:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ATI XGP[edit]

Is not the term XGP be ambiguous? What about the ATI XGP platform? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.23.145 (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XGP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://gp32x.com/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101026044701/http://www.gp2x.info:80/ to http://gp2x.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]