Template:Did you know nominations/Fourth Fitna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Fourth Fitna[edit]

Created/expanded by Cplakidas (talk). Self nom at 12:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Excellent if densely-written article. Probably could use more paragraph breaks and some "dumbing down" here and there to not appear so daunting to casual readers. There are a lot of interpretative statements ("unexpected", "unusual", "intended", "believed", "resented"), although most seem to be correctly sourced or plausible in the context and certainly helpful and compelling to the narrative (which, let me repeat, is of excellent quality, and although heavily reliant on a few sources, no plagiarism is apparent). Images are kosher, although the first map is perhaps not the most suitable as it covers several centuries of phases rather than governing districts of this particular time, and should probably be susbtituted when a better map is found. Only quibble is that as al-Ma'mum and al-Amin are caliphal titles not personal names, the prefix "al-" should probably be maintained consistently through the article and not dropped intermittently. It meets DYK criteria on novelty, length, neutrality, citations and is apparently free of plagiarism. Images are free of probems. The hook is fine, if a little on the dull side, but I can't think up a better one. Walrasiad (talk) 22:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)