Template:Did you know nominations/Guillermo Rodriguez Gonzalez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 13:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Guillermo Rodriguez Gonzalez[edit]

Moved to mainspace by LauraHale (talk). Self nominated at 20:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC).

  • The instructions say "Create a subpage for your new DYK suggestion and then list the page below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here)". Currently the article's prose is at 4092 B. A 5-fold increase in the prose of the article has occurred if we start counting from Nov 30 (241 B), but has not occurred if we start counting from Dec 1 (853 B). So please move this nomination to Nov 30.VR talk 05:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Full review needed. Article was moved from user space to article space on December 1, meaning it was new as of that date: by definition, any article moved and nominated on the same day counts as new and nominated on time for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Spot-checking for copyvios did not reveal any problems. The article exceeds 1,500 characters. Every paragraph is sourced. However, the hook as stated here does not exist in the article; it doesn't state in the article that Gonzalez "blamed" the heat for not medaling. In the article it states that "London heat caused issues with Rodríguez's bow, resulting in shots going "eight to the left"." A simple fix for this problem would be to modify the hook to reflect content in the article and sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
I found a ref for the hook fact in a translation of a report. I have added this explicitly to the article. This should allow this to proceed. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 11:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)