Template talk:Microsoft video gaming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the Xbox task force.
 
WikiProject Microsoft (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Nice edit on the Upcoming part. Very slick. ;) JAF1970 18:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, just trying to keep it neat. :) TH1RT3EN talkcontribs 18:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion[edit]

I think that we should merge this template into the Microsoft template or delete it. The Microsoft template has a section on all the video game products and futures of the video games produced by Microsoft. Any suggestions? RkOrToN 02:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Although would including the links on this template not already in the Microsoft template make the Microsoft template overly lengthy? Sardanaphalus (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, yea. RkOrToN 01:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

SEGA DreamCast[edit]

Thinking of adding Dreamcast to the miscellaneous, because it used "The operating system used by some Dreamcast titles was developed by Microsoft after 2 years of work with Sega. It was an optimized version of Windows CE supporting DirectX." so it's an example of Microsoft involvement in Video Games. Just thought I'd post this idea here first incase anyone has any objections or there is any reason it's not already mentioned in the template?  Doktor  Wilhelm  07:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)