Template talk:Oz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Novels (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Oz (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Oz series and The Wonderful Wizard of Oz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 NA  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Children's literature (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Wicked[edit]

Wicked and its sequels, all non-canonical are less releavent to this template than the original Oz books. I propose that they either be deleted or the original Oz books listed. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Nevertheless, the "canon" of Oz has always been a rather loose concept. I propose that Gregory Maguire be included in the list of authors. 68.148.173.40 (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Wasn't Baum the author of some books?[edit]

You'd never know it looking at the template. Evidently the parodies make fun of the movies.Varlaam (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you would if you actually looked at it.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Bugger off, and put the bloody books in the template.
And mind your manners. Varlaam (talk) 06:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Apparently, the sarcasm got away from some here. It currently looks like baums books are properly represented.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011)[edit]

Which film is this? is it the adaption slated for 2012, mentioned at Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz#Future adaptations?[1] or something else? It should not be in the template unless we know which film its referring to and whether its assured to qualify for an article. the film we already mention that i have guessed it is doesnt seem to be notable enough to be in the template (though i could be wrong, as any baum fan worth their salt should be salivating over accurately portrayed characters and a script based strictly on the book).If its this film [2], its not notable yet.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)