User talk:104.34.202.79

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (104.34.202.79) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 18:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Max Dashu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is neutral and sourced. It is not my problem that you don't like the subjects views on transgender people. That she was removed from public events for those views. It is your personal bias that is excluding those views and making the article less accurate104.34.202.79 (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nina Paley. Binksternet (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then let the blocks begin. It is not poorly sourced nor is it defamatory. It is fact. I say put it before the board 104.34.202.79 (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Nina_Paley#NOLA1982_Disruptive_Editing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Binksternet (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well then do it. I'm happy to have other editors step in now. What is obvious is you have a personal investment in a subject you know nothing about. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Talk:Nina Paley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2019[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 06:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Do you really think I care ? The only thing disruptive it was the truth and in real life, unlike the fantasy environment of wikipedia there will be hell to pay. Own this moment of your limited power. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 08:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have had your little power trip Nazi. I will finish this in the real world my way. Enjoy. IRL , you are nothing :) 104.34.202.79 (talk) 09:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Above is what it looks like when abusive ,racist and bigoted faux academics attack minorities in a completely bias and hateful way on the opinion dictionary for racists.104.34.202.79 (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---Oh and f u c k you all.

What, no more abuse. No blocks, no BS lies? Amazing. I am going to do everything to get rid of this group of abusive, racist privileged white mans country club of lies! 104.34.202.79 (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Nina Paley. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. If you wish to improve the article, bring reliable secondary sources to the talk page. If you want to raise genuine issues about editor conduct, please do so at an appropriate noticeboard. If you just want to sling mud, well, please don't (or, if you feel that you have to, use Twitter or Reddit instead). Wham2001 (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Show me at any point where I slung mud ? If the "appropriate place" is not where the bias statements occurred , where is it ? Did the editor make those statements ? Yes. Oh, I'm sorry I haven't read your 20,000 page manifesto of people who don't live on wikipedia. I'm not stating the facts in the wiki sanctioned place. This is why people hate the police, this kind of abuse of power . You have no oversight and you are drunk with power. You have two powers, one to threaten users , two to block them. That is the extent of it. Do it for all I care. The article is a whitewash. Everyone sees it. Everyone knows it. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this page and ask yourself if I care what abuse you heap on me. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and I should add Binksternet reverted a version in talk that identified no one. By the way, did you remove the section where Binksternet told transgender people to get over Nina Paley's anti transgender personal attacks? No, you didn't. Find one thing that I said was a lie or unsupported. I dare you. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Nina Paley; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no edit war, it is your censorship and white washing of an article . You have lost it so badly you can't even take being called out for it on the the articles talk page. I suggest you and Nina get help for your transphobia. Here on wikipedia where you can bully people because they are gay or transgender you have free reign to be abusive and bully anyone you want. Enlist the aid of your wiki Nazis to suppress the truth. Out there you are powerless and everyone knows Binksternet . Everyone. You can pretend that it is something else but we both know the truth. I will wait the year or two years revert back this talk page. The article is fraudulent. And everyone knows it. I could care less what you do. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, 104.34.202.79. I notice that in the past you've made some contributions to Nina Paley that got reverted. I've been attempting to add the most important sources regarding Paley's transphobia while being scrupulous about Wikipedia primary source policy, since there have been past controversies on the subject. I've added back the Mimi & Eunice link, along with a description of the contents.

Wikipedia policy discourages us from making statements like "Paley depicts trans women as walking penises, which is dehumanizing and transphobic" in articles, unless we have appropriate sources not only for the cartoons but also for the fact that people think they're transphobic. If you do have some WP:RELIABLE sources meeting WP:BLPSPS criteria discussing Paley's transphobia, we could include content from those.

Given these constraints, do you think I'm missing anything important and relevant to Paley's transphobia here?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

―Ilzolende (talk) 06:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia censors. You really think that her friends are going to let you post anything? Binksternet is in her ...... social group and says "Get over it" to transwomen with complete hypocrisy the same way he wouldn't about Ninas religion. Wikipedia is a white privileged group of white supremacists practicing the rewritting of history to suit white supremacy.104.34.202.79 (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.