User talk:16AdityaG09

Welcome...

Hello, 16AdityaG09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Some pages you might like to check out are:

Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia – main welcome page.
Wikipedia:Introduction – Wikipedia introduction page.
Wikipedia:Tutorial – Wikipedia editing tutorial.
Wikipedia:Questions – the "where to ask questions" directory.
Wikipedia:FAQ – quick answers to the most common questions.
Wikipedia:Questions – a place for new users to post questions and get answers by volunteers who monitor or frequent the page.
Wikipedia:Help desk – where volunteers answer questions on how to use Wikipedia. Many new users go there for help too.
Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user – where a new user can be adopted by an experienced user who will be their mentor.
Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual – Thorough and intuitive guide to Wikipedia.

Agra

Do not remove content and images without discussion. Agra is a level 4 vital article and this format is maintained that way for a long time. Only the most obvious things like improving sources, adding new sourced information and the removal of info that doesn't belong to the article should be removed, like the one on Fatehpur Sikri that you removed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of existing source

Any particular reason why you removed this source in these edits? You have to clearly mention your reasons in the edit summary. "Improved section" wouldn't do. Also read WP:STATUSQUO. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16AdityaG09 (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)I didn't remove the source, I removed that line from the introduction, because it was going into too much detail about a period which which is not the main part of the history. No problem, I will add this line and source back in the history section, not in the introduction.[reply]

Missing cite in Agra

You have added a short reference to "Sharma 1993" but no such work is listed in the bibliography. Please add the full source. Thank you, Renata (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16AdityaG09 (talk) 06:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)It is not my own finding. See the wiki page corresponding to that line; that's where I took this line and source from.[reply]

16AdityaG09 (talk) 08:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC) I have unearthed the original reference and cited that in the article. done.[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice for the Arab-Israeli conflict

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required. Doug Weller talk 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chalcides simonyi

Hi 16AdityaG09, would you take a look at the result of this edit? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Our Daily Bread (1949 film). — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Unified Launch Vehicle

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Unified Launch Vehicle, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Tautomers_{(T C)} 00:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Economy of Bihar without adequately explaining why. Removed uncited/disputable facts is not an adequate way of describing an edit that removed some citations. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Economy of Bihar in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Economy of Gujarat

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Economy of Gujarat, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]