User talk:213.1.220.130

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 213.1.220.130, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ed!(talk) 15:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bloomsbury Publishing has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bloomsbury Publishing was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://publiclibraryonline.wordpress.com (redirect from http://www.publiclibraryonline.com/)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! 213.1.220.130, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at AfC Writers' and Artists' Yearbook was accepted[edit]

Writers' and Artists' Yearbook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Libby norman (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victor margolin entry[edit]

Hi, it seems from your IP address that you may be someone based at Bloomsbury Press. I just wanted to say that I have edited the entry you made on the Wikipedia page for Victor Margolin (back in February 2015), about the lifetime achievement award he received. Your entry said it was awarded 'by the Design Research Society', but in fact it was made by the group of organisers of the conference at which it was awarded: they were the DesignEd Coalition, Cumulus, and the DesignPedagogy Special Interest Group of the Design Research Society. On the Bloomsbury author page for Victor it says the award was made by 'Cumulus and DRS'. I would be grateful if you could correct that entry also. I ask this because I am the President of the Design Research Society with some responsibility for making DRS Lifetime Achievement Awards (which was not what Victor was actually awarded). Nigel Cross (talk) 14:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]