User talk:2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 15:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Kevin Feige. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rupert Grint. Philipnelson99 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Rupert_Grint.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

My Demands[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you missed two edits. We talk, I'll give you the location of one up front and the other after you unblock me.

Decline reason:

We can live with the status quo. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0 (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been pretty immature lately. The edits I put in I thought were funny were actually trivialising a lot of people's hard work and was derivative of trolls that have come before me.

Through exploring wikipedia, I've discovered so many opportunities to improve. I am knowledgeable in many areas that need expanding and have seen several typos and erros left behind. I want to do this legitimately and create an account.

It was stupid of me to try to blackmail the admins into unblocking me. You wound up finding one of the edits. So as a token of good faith, I'll tell you where the other one is. In the first paragraph of Shane Dawson's memoirs, I put a citation needed that did not need to be there.

I look forward to hearing from you. 2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0 (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a decent start, but you will need to tell us what edits you intend to make in order for the block to be removed early. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request Part 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2403:5809:986:0:B4D6:2D0C:B1B1:70F0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please refer to my previous request for more information. I've been asked to list what edits I want to make before I am unblocked early. I want to find a better photo for Neil Breen and found some incorrect information about who reviewed Fateful Findings. I'd also like to fix up Scooby Doo: Night of 100 Frights and expand on the artistic style of the game. 159.196.168.255 (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser block. The IP appealing the block is not the blocked IP, thus there is no reason to lift the block. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Neither this IP nor the one you're posting from is currently blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. This IP address is blocked by me as part of a range. See here. I agree that 159.196.168.255 is (currently) not blocked, though it's clearly the same person. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.