User talk:51.6.69.81

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Pathworkzerone (talk) 09:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Yamla. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of national birds have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was very constructive. The robin is the national bird of England, not the UK.

Why can Scotland and Wales have their own national birds, but not England? That's racist. Are you racist? 51.6.69.81 (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not what the source says, and knock it off. Personal attacks like that will get you blocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 00:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Paulpat99 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 15:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.69.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong, and blocking me is an outrageous overreaction. To call my edits 'vandalism' is absurd. I merely made edits to over-the-top and specious entries which added nothing to the truth of the topic in question. I have been very badly treated here, and I expect a resumption of my access to the site with immediate effect.

Decline reason:

Perhaps it would be more accurate to call your edits "disruptive editing" instead. A little bit of edit warring at Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics. I don't see where you attempted to discuss your edits with anyone. I'm not really seeing anything to motivate me to unblock you. You can try again with someone else. 331dot (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.69.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here My request for unblocking has been unfairly denied. I was told the reason for this denial was because I did not discuss the [completely justified] edits I made in something called a sandbox. I knew nothing about this need to discuss changes, and now I'm being penalised for my ignorance in the form of a year's ban. People do less time for murder. I request that my ability to edit is restored completely, now that the rules have been underlined to me. This outright blocking is unfair and totally uncalled for.

Decline reason:

A bizarre unblock request, albeit one common among Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP requests. You made zero edits to a sandbox and your prior unblock request was not declined with any mention of a sandbox. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.