User talk:66.77.160.179

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. An edit you recently made to Characters of Diablo seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Characters of Diablo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Production car speed record has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Production car speed record was changed by 66.77.160.179 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969128 on 2016-06-08T03:19:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Production car speed record with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Poisonwood Bible, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rage (emotion).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rage (emotion) was changed by 66.77.160.179 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912161 on 2016-06-23T00:34:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pablo Escobar. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Chaser (talk) 03:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Colors (film)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Colors (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 03:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lester Holt— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brokeback Mountain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Justin15w (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brokeback Mountain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Justin15w (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Creed (band), you may be blocked from editing. Justin15w (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doggystyle. Justin15w (talk) 02:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to One Piece have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at One Piece. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Normandy[edit]

Judging by the comments on your talk page, your edits on the Normandy articles are being much better received. Thanks for taking the time to look them over. I follow them up but that isn't because I think they're wrong, far from it but they do highlight failings in the prose. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments and encouragement; multi-user IP, so the quality of edits will vary over topics.

NB it might help if you set up a page like User:Keith-264/common.js and install importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js'); harv errors show up in red. There's also one which adds a highlighter for duplicate links which I find very handy. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gold Beach into Utah Beach. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First day[edit]

I'll step aside while you're copy-editing and then have another look. I broadly agree with your edits, tho' sometimes not the punctuation. ;o) Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I appreciate the co-operation and teamwork. I will not be able to get more done today, and will edit sporadically over the coming days.66.77.160.179 (talk) 17:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It might help if you set up a page like User:Keith-264/common.js and install importScript('User:Evad37/duplinks-alt.js'); it makes duplicate wikilinks show up in red. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 47 Meters Down— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Osiris, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ammons haunting case have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.