Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Signs 2, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Mike • 22:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Yanksox(talk) 02:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Yanksox(talk) 02:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Category:2006 films, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Mike • 23:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your article regarding Cambrelo has been nominated for deletion, as neither Google, Google Local, the U.S. Census, or the postal service have heard of the town, and the link to a website which you provided not only doesn't work but isn't even owned.
Furthermore, your pattern of adding hoax articles to Wikipedia has been noticed by many editors, and your contributions are now being rather intensely monitored by people who wish to prevent Wikipedia from being vandalized. I thought I was going to have to jump on it to catch this latest, but others were already ready to do so.
Your IP address has already been tied to this account, as well — here, so don't presume that you can do this anonymously now, either, as you've tried before.
I therefore suggest you decide which route you want to go:
You can either stay and continue vandalizing, and you will eventually get to a point where you will be banned from editing Wikipedia (not just blocked, but banned).
You can stay and become a fruitful and productive editor, and you will eventually be appreciated and honored.
Or you can leave.
Whichever way you wish to go, your choice should be made soon. And if you're going to pick #1, save us all some grief and instead just jump to #3. — Mike • 04:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- MOE.RONtalk | done | doing 19:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. -- MOE.RONtalk | done | doing 19:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- MOE.RONtalk | done | doing 19:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. -- The Anome 19:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Are We Done Yet?. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Mike • 19:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Anome 19:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. .Blnguyen | rant-line 08:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading [[:{{{1}}}]]. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
You added hoax movie articles to Wikipedia before, refused to stop after being asked to, and were eventually blocked. The block expired, and you proceeded to then add I'll Know Forever What You Did Last Summer, yet another hoax movie article, today. You were prevented from editing for 1 month before. I am now blocking you for 6 months. Uncle G 22:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As you have been warned several times before, consider this your final warning. You will be blocked if you continue removing AFD notices from articles. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. JuJube 00:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
