User talk:Bluedolphin20

Hi Bluedolphin20! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

15:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC) There will be no more unreliable blog spam. I agree to the condition. :)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 18:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bluedolphin20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Bluedolphin20 (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC) I added only related links from my blog. They provide value. It isn't spamming. I am not adding unrelated links. For example- I added the healthcare section under 5G's applications which provides value to the reader. However, I agree on adding excessive links in my last two edits. Apologies for that. It won't happen again in future. I assure you. Please unblock me so that I can begin contributing to Wikipedia again. Rest assured, it won't happen again.[reply]

Decline reason:

Despite the explanations you have been given, I gather from your response that you still want to edit about your blog which indicates that you don't seem to understand the conflict of interest policy. The conditions for unblocking you are that you need to agree to not directly edit about your blog at all, and if you truly feel it "adds value" to an article you must make an edit request on the article talk page and disclose that it is your blog(you should also make such disclosure on your user page). As I've indicated, blogs are not usually accepted as sources, but you are still permitted to make such requests. If you accept these conditions, please indicate that in another request that will be reviewed by another administrator, I am declining this one. You are free to request unblock without accepting these conditions, but I doubt such a request would be successful. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read about conflict of interest. In addition, blogs in general are not usually considered reliable sources here due to the fact that the vast majority of them lack editorial control and fact-checking. Blogs also usually consist of original research. I would consider unblocking you if you agreed to not edit about your blog(along with any conditions Ferret might have). 331dot (talk) 21:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Block was to stop unreliable blog spam. If the user promises not to do this any more, fine by me. They need to read up WP:RS and promise they will not add their own site to articles again (or any other blogs) -- ferret (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I won't be adding unrelated links like my last few edtis. The 5G edit and link added value to the article. I won't spam and will obey the rules. Apologies again for the inconvenience caused. ferret — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluedolphin20 (talk • contribs)