User talk:CognitivePsychPhD2014

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CognitivePsychPhD2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 15:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Logan (April 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gordon Logan.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheCascadian 22:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CognitivePsychPhD2014. You have new messages at TheCascadian's talk page.
Message added 21:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheCascadian 21:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gordon Logan concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gordon Logan, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Logan (academic) (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Logan (academic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 15:22, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! CognitivePsychPhD2014, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 15:22, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Logan (academic) has been accepted[edit]

Gordon Logan (academic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi. I created a second article and made it a draft so that others could let me know if it needs changes or additional work of any kind. I am not sure if I should be doing something to submit it for review or what. Thanks! -- CPP

CognitivePsychPhD2014 (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you've already submitted two articles, one decline and the other accepted, so you should be familiar with the process and what makes a good article. Use {{subst:submit}} at the top of the draft to submit it for review. I think the article needs more work, especially regarding formatting and bare references. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 22:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hexafluoride: Many thanks! Actually my first posting does seem to have been accepted with just some light editing by someone else, which I was glad they did. Turning to this second contribution, yeah the references do seem bare--I wasn't sure about that but your link there will help. CognitivePsychPhD2014 (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am trying to replace the bare references with fully specified references. A lot of them are magazine articles, eg in Newsweek or whatever. When I am in edit mode and click to insert a Cite, it offers me four templates, for News, Journal, etc. I am not offered Magazine Template, even though I have the impression that that does exist. Can you advise me how I can get that? Thanks.

CognitivePsychPhD2014 (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can add it manually: Either edit the code like this: <ref>{{cite magazine|title=ABC|first=John |last=Doe |magazine=Newsweek |date=February 29, 2016}}</ref> See Template:Cite magazine for the full list of available parameters. Or, if you prefer the Visual Editor, when you click to insert a citation, choose "Basic form", then "Insert: Template", then type "Cite magazine" (without the quotation marks) to get that template. Personally I tend to use "journal" or "news" instead; cases where you need parameters not provided by those templates will be rare. Huon (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pashler draft 11 2016 has been accepted[edit]

Pashler draft 11 2016, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]