User talk:Crzer07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, Crzer07! Thank you for your contributions. I am MartinPoulter and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

MartinPoulter (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Ephebophilia, not truly a paraphilia[edit]

As noted in its article, the List of paraphilias article, and in a discussion that took place on the Ephebophilia talk page, ephebophilia is not truly a paraphilia. The only time it can possibly be diagnosed as a disorder is "if it results in dysfunction or exploitative behavior," listed under the DSM specification 309.2, "Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified." Therefore, I reverted you on that part of this edit. 31.193.132.76 (talk) 20:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

TemplateData is here[edit]

Hey Crzer07

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

WP:Navbox[edit]

Please, recall what do guidelines say about inserting of navigational templates:

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

By the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intercultural_philosophy&diff=564782469 edit you added two navboxes of which neither currently has the Intercultural philosophy link. Such addition of non-reciprocal navboxes is not an isolated edit. Could you provide a plan of your navboxification campaign? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Philandry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philandry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philandry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.