User talk:DonCasT2

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DonCasT2, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi DonCasT2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Horana Royal College[edit]

Please stop redirecting Horana Royal College to Royal College, Horana. The naming of Sri Lankan "Royal College" schools has been discussed extensively at Talk:Royal College, Colombo and there was no consensus to change this school's name to Royal College, Horana.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 11:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before you continue reverting mine and others edits please read this discussion. There is no consensus on renaming Horana Royal College to Royal College, Horana. You are going against consensus and therefore violating Wikipedia policy.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 12:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Less than a handful of editors have discussed extensively' for ages naming of Sri Lankan Royal College schools for consensus ?. You have violated the quick & easy WP:Article titles Wikipedia policy.

Royal is just a very common name used every where not only for schools in Sri Lanka (plus world) but for Cashews, Curtains, Food Courts, Bakeries, Hotels, Ceremics, Malls, Drapers, Textiles, Barber Saloons, Butcher Shops, Sanitary Ware, Cake Shops, Roti Houses etc. If it is illegal to use Royal other than who are queen granted, relevant Governments of the world must have closed all by now. For few examples see below:

Reference: Royal Cashew

Reference: Royal Curtain

Reference: Royal Food Court

Reference: Royal Food Court Maharagama

Reference: Royal Bakery Wellawatte

Reference: The Royal Bakery

Reference: Royal Palms Beach Hotel

Reference: Royal Bakery

Reference: Royal Beach

Reference: Royal Ceremics

Reference: Royal Institute of Colombo

Reference: Royal Holidays

Reference: The Royal Mall

Reference: Royal Drapers

Reference: Royal Fabric Textiles

Reference: Royal India Holiday

Reference: Royal Bakery Eeuipment

Reference: Royal Bakery and Roti House

Reference: Royal Bagel Bakery & Deli

Reference: Royal Bakery

Reference: Royal Barber & Hairstyling Salon

Reference: Royal Barber Shop'

Reference: The Royal Butcher

Reference: The Royal Butcher

Reference: Royal Cake Shop

Reference: Royal Bakery

Reference: Royal Barber Shop

Reference: Royal Sanitary Ware

(DonCasT2 (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Consensus is need for change, not for the status quo. You need show consensus for the name change to Royal College, Horana, otherwise the article has to remain Horana Royal College. The rest of your comment is gibberish, reminiscent of someone else...who's pulling your strings?--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 11:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Please stop. Your edits are being disputed and reverted. Please discuss things and get consensus at the article's talk page. You must not just keep redirect the article if what you are doing is disputed. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop and discuss. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Read the paragraph above. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You & the string pullers are legends?... do it at your leisure--DonCasT2^talk

Have any of your efforts here over time ever, ever, ever ended the way you like? Try to understand that you cannot force you will here. You have to get agreement. When you finally understand that, you will see that you have wasted lots of your time. It has all been for nothing. Look at all of these article titles you have been trying to change. All of them are the way the community wants them to be and not how you want them to be. Look at the end result. You must see the futility. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:09, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can pull your strings any way you like and ban or try to discourage master editors. As long as wikipedia is available will contribute quality articles to it. You may think that you & your other bunch of string pullers are the only good guys & rest are bad (DonCasT2 (talk) 05:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Masu7 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your talk page access. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, nobody can stop you, but we don't waste too much energy worrying about it. You edit secretly and constructively and nobody notices you, and I don't care. You try to force your way with articles, we notice and block you, and I still don't care. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St. Paul’s Girls School, Milagiriya Logo.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St. Paul’s Girls School, Milagiriya Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]