User talk:DeirdreAnne/Archives/2011/11

This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the current talk page for the period Please specify dates with: {{Chronological talk archive|dates}}.

In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page.

If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there.

Notice at the top of my user page/user talk

Just letting you know that I find it quite complimentary when people call me Doug. But it is a little confusing, hence the notice. :-) --Dweller (talk) 11:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Draft RFC

Thanks for the reminder. It turned out to be unnecessary because another editor had less patience than I did and started their own RFC. The user in question was banned by Arbcom after the RFC failed to bring an improvement in their behaviour and a RFA was opened. I'll delete the page. Mjroots (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Zhang's RFA

Regarding my oppose vote at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Steven Zhang, I won't comment at length because the discussion has closed and it would be unfair on the candidate to protract the issue. However, I accept that I worded badly that part of my comment that related to "nomination shopping". I respect you and Pedro (to whom I have also posted this message), and I did not at all mean to imply what it appears I did. Regards, AGK [•] 22:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Caesar

I'm somewhat perplexed about what it is you want done to the article on Julius Caesar. The copyediting tag mainly indicates "mechanical" problems such as spelling, grammar, punctuation, faulty sentence construction, lax formatting, and so on. It also indicates problems with "cohesion" (whatever that means—I take it to mean logical organization, which I don't find lacking there) and "tone," meaning a non-encyclopedic tone. Could you be more specific on the talk page? Thanks. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was in the middle of that when I got pulled away by real life, I'll leave details shortly.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 21:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing
Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]