User talk:Drugonot

input sought[edit]

In a message to several recent editors of Schiavo-related pages, I write that: Input is sought here: Talk:Government_involvement_in_the_Terri_Schiavo_case#Edit_War_between_me_and_User:Calton.

--GordonWatts 15:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Websites against paypal[edit]

Read the talk page. These websites have been discussed several times and deemed to be inappropriate.--Crossmr 18:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was an arbcom ruling which determined that attack sites were inappropriate. They did agree on the talk page if a reliable source, like a news article (genuine) were to do a story on fraud or something on paypal and the article linked to the attack site, that would be fine, but there isn't supposed to be any direct linking to attack sites, at least on the en wikipedia.--Crossmr 19:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Drugonot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Dfrg.msc 06:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule[edit]

Please read WP:3RR before continuing editing the Rorschach inkblot test article. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum 21:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rorschach inkblot test[edit]

I understand that you have strong opinions regarding the Rorschach inkblot test, but please remain civil under all circumstances. Calling other people troll when they are engaging in actual discussion is not very nice. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum 19:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rorschach link[edit]

Please note that the link was done specifically that way to allow functionality without Javascript. There had been a lot of complaints that clicking the wikilink did not work for people who had Javascript disabled. Please discuss on Talk page before reverting. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a consensus to have the link the way it was. Wikipedia operates by consensus, not by your personal preferences. If you continue to revert and start an edit war, I will make a vandalism report. Ward3001 (talk) 15:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"i haven't found the discussion about the consensus": There was discussion and consensus. Read the Talk page. I had no difficulty finding it. Ward3001 (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"are you out of mind?...Have you got it?":

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but did you read the Talk page? It's not in the archives, but it is discussed in different places on the Talk page. Do a search for "java". Some of the the finds are not relevant, but many discuss the issue. Ward3001 (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me suggest that you raise the issue on the article's Talk page before making any changes. That would be the courteous, "consensus" way to do it. Remember, blind adherence to the letter of the law is not always in the best interest of Wikipedia, and there are exceptions to every rule. I think if you explain your points on the Talk page, within a day or two you'll get some responses. Ward3001 (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm a bit surprised that no one has responded. Give it a day or two past the weekend. If no one comments, then be my guest to make the change without any interference from me. Ward3001 (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressors[edit]

Thanks for your correction re: "special forces" vs. "law enforcement" - I learn something everyday! GMan552 (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manga images discussion[edit]

Please offer your input in a current debate on the use of manga covers in articles at Talk:List of Hunter × Hunter chapters#Use of Images. Thank you! Shimawa zen (talk) 17:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review[edit]

Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xeno^talk 14:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, we would appreciate if you could briefly take the time to place yourself below one of the suggested statements here. If none of these statements represents your current position, please compose your own or simply sign "Not applicable" under "Other quick clarifications". Likewise sign as N/A if you do not want to participate further in this debate. If you choose not to respond then you will likely not be counted with respect to further consensus-determining efforts. –xeno^talk 14:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valerio Capello[edit]

Proposed for deletion, bye --92.106.97.232 (talk) 13:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now afD. Bye --Invitamia (talk) 00:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eq ar val-edo c-e.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eq ar val-edo c-e.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ElfQrin-mx-t-1b 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ElfQrin-mx-t-1b 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]