User talk:Dutral

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dutral, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 19 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Saab JAS 39 Gripen. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fanny Crosby may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JC's Girls[edit]

Hi Dutral,

I noticed that you made a large number of minor typographical edits throughout the JC's Girls article, most of which switched one form of apostrophe for another or changed the established reference format. Please note that Wikipedia guidelines on apostrophes prescribe the straight apostrophe rather than the curly apostrophe and that reference formats should generally remain whatever the first major contributor to the article established. If you have concerns about the formatting of this article, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Neelix (talk) 01:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moses may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Discourses | publisher = Louisville Council of Jewish Women | year = 1903 | page = 93}}.</ref>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matthew Henry may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Quote | He is allowed by all competent judges, to have been a person of strong understanding, of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merkava may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • militants during the ground fighting phase of Operation Protective Edge, according to the IDF.<ref>{{Citation | place = [[Israel |IL]] | url = http://www.maariv.co.il/news/new.aspx?pn6Vq=E&0r9VQ=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to reference format[edit]

Please do not make mass changes to reference format without consensus. See WP:CITEVAR for a further explanation.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Dutral. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Operation Auca for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]