User talk:HatBucketBalls

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HatBucketBalls, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! BlueAg09 (Talk) 07:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

adoption offer

A while ago you said you liked the idea of being adopted. If you're still interested, I'd be happy to adopt you. Please let me know if you'd like that on my talk page. Sticky Parkin 13:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok then:) If you need help/suggestions with anything at any point, feel free to ask.:) Sticky Parkin 09:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

IHSAA

Hi sorry my talk page gets a bit cluttered recently so I missed you asking for feedback for your article. It's an ok article IMHO, though sporting articles are not ones I've worked on much. For an article, include some WP:RS third party sources (not just the group itself.) Rather than informal running websites etc, use as references articles you find in a google news search [1] as they're often well-known newspapers etc and other wikipedians will be impressed. There are loads of newspaper articles etc that mention this group, so it should get to keep its article. You chose your subject well. Well done! Sticky Parkin 20:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Woody

Per WP:Naming Conventions we use the most commonly used name, so that would be woody.:) The problem with this person would be finding WP:RS. Do you have some books that mention him that you can use as references and list, because there's not much about him on the internet? (because he's not been in the news for obvious reasons. :) ) Pages on sportsmen usually stick on wiki though. Sticky Parkin 02:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

What I mean is, historical sportsmen, major league sportsmen etc. A high school basketball coach article is highly unlikely to survive, like the Gregg Downer article, unfortunately.:( Here is the guidelines for articles on sports people- Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Athletes. "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A)". Sticky Parkin 14:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Basically, a sportman has to have been in one of the top leagues to count, I'm not sure what the guideline would be for coaches. The rules about whether something would get an article are quite complicated and it might be worth reading recent discussions at WP:AfD to get a feel for which articles die and why. Sticky Parkin 22:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

downer etc.

A high school coach would rarely have an aticle IMHO. For a coach to have an article, he'd have to be not a high school coach, but a coach for a professional team, I imagine (this isn't my specialist subject.) It would have to be coaches for the actual Lakers who he plays for professionally, for instance. Los_Angeles_Lakers#Head_coaches. What you say about Downer's involvement in speaking in the press about Kobe might mean you could try and insert a brief mention of him in Kobe's own article, if his comments were in the national press or something. I know how annoying it can be, as my first article, which I thought was notable, was deleted :( Something tends to need to be mentioned in a fair few WP:RS to keep an article.

P.S. Sorry if I answered late- you had written on my user page rather than talk, so I didn't get a message at the top of the screen saying I had new messages. Take a look at my user page to see the funky colour of the background of your comment.:)Sticky Parkin 19:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Gregg Downer message on my talk page

It looks like you've already had a discussion with Sticky Parkin about this. If you still have questions, please feel free to drop me another line. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 00:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

page

No problem- I thought it looked funky.:) Keep going with your editing and don't let the deletion get you down too much- I know what it can feel like :( but a lot of us have been there.:) Sticky Parkin 21:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

welcome back

Nice to see you back here. Sticky Parkin 01:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Goliath grouper

Sorry I only just spotted what you were saying. Yes I've lived in interesting times here lol, but all sorted now.:) Sorry I didn't reply earlier- was under the influence of wine lol:) I think they'll somehow revert you, as the articles tend to go by the "most commonly used name" Wikipedia:Naming conventions even if that's not the 'proper' name. But I don't know enough about the fish to know. The problem with a move is that it's not as easy to reverse as you think, I don't think. So it's better to discuss it on the talk page and wait a while first, unless the article's just a scruffy thing no-one's edited for ages or something and it's an obvious move. But I'm so glad you're back:) What've you been doing with yourself? Sticky Parkin 22:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal was to gather feedback to help design a tool that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

We are particularly interested in feedback from new editors! We want to make sure this tool meets your needs.

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 23:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!

Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

New messages

Hello, HatBucketBalls. You have new messages at Guoguo12's talk page.
Message added 20:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Guoguo12--Talk--  20:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!

Please help! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog is still very large. Still exceeding 20,000 articles! The goal is 18,000 or less. Lets see if we can do it! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thank you for all your help thus far! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs), and WikiCopter (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini Drive

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini! Hello, I thought you would be interested in the March Mini, a coordinated effort by WikiProject Wikify members to eliminate the 2008 backlog of articles tagged with {{wikify}} and/or {{dead end}}. Come join in the fun! There are only three prizes to be won, including a special barnstar created just for this drive! Regards, WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC).

The Wikifier: March 2011

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue II, March 2011 From the editor • General news Membership • February drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Hello Wikifiers! Sorry this Newsletter is late, It should have gone out a month ago. I've been very busy in real life and didn't have time to get over to the newsletter. In this edition of the Newsletter, we have an editorial written by our new executive coordinator; Guoguo12. Guoguo12 has succeeded Mono due to an indefinite wikibreak. We also have the results of the February and March Mini drives. Happy Wikifying, Sumsum2010, the assistant coordinator of WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 02:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC).

June 2011 Wikification Drive

Sumsum2010·T·C 22:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify Discussion Invitation

Sumsum2010·T·C 23:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Casey Hurrell-Zitelman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey Hurrell-Zitelman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Hurrell-Zitelman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HatBucketBalls. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HatBucketBalls. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IHSAA logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IHSAA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)