User talk:ItsWalky

Optimus Primal Pictures[edit]

I saw you added the 10th ANniversary Optimus Primal to my picture of all the Optimus Primals in scale. I think there is a problem with the scale though. You have Universe Op and 10th Anniversary Op standing as tall as Optimal Optimus, however, we clearly see him standing eye-to-eye with Depth Charge and Razorclaw (who is Tigatron), which is why I originally made him between the size of Optimal Optimus and his original form. user:mathewignash

Thing is, we also see Primal as tall as Armada Megatron and War Within Grimlock. And in the club comics, we see 10th Anniversary Primal able to carry Rhinox and Cheetor under his arms. According to Dan Khanna, the artist of those shots, Primal is supposed to be pretty freakin' large. Marcelo Matere must have drawn him a little smaller, or we can assume Universe Depth Charge is also bigger, as well as Razorclaw. (I should also note that TM Primal is considerably bigger than original Primal, since before he was smaller than Rhinox and after he was larger.) --ItsWalky! 18:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Forgot to mention, since I think I guess that was the point of my argument, that Dan Khanna was co-plotter, and that's why his word is better than Matere's in this circumstance. --ItsWalky! 18:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet[edit]

Hey are you from the Teletraan-1 the Transformers Wiki like Rosicrucian?(Thunderclacker the F22 (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Don't bother, Walky. This sock is blocked already for having all the subtlety of a hammer to the forebrain.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 20:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HATRED[edit]

ItsWalky, you are a slaggin' slag-faced motha slaggin' slag who's slaggin' mother was a *bleeeeeeeeep*!

And furthermore, about yourself: You are the *bleeeeeeeep*-est motha *bleeeeeeep*-ing *bleeeeeeeeep* I have ever had the *bleeeeeeeep*-ing displeasure of knowing in all my *bleeeep* days(which actually, ain't that many)!!!!!

So, in short, I am throwing all the *bleeeeeeeeep*-ing curses I know at you without saying a single bad word (except slag, which is a TF bad word so it doesn't really exist as a curse but I myself make excessive use of it).

I HATE YOU!

You are slag.

P.S. Consider this my *bleeeeeep*-ing Valentine's Day card to you.

imagine what I'd say if it wasn't almost valentine's day Guess Who? (talk)

I second the motion. ShinkisRule (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Optimusprimal-toys.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Optimusprimal-toys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ultracons[edit]

The article Ultracons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Transformers trivia. No reliable sources cited, no evidence of real-world notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Milburn (talk) 15:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WorldHarvestChurch-ultimategiveaway.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WorldHarvestChurch-ultimategiveaway.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ComicsAlliance for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ComicsAlliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ComicsAlliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 07:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ratbat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratbat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratbat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Object, your honor! Information is helpful. Jtarvin (talk). 6:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Do you want to talk to me? Jtarvin (talk). 6:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)