User talk:Jpatros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth "Izzy Bell" Warrenton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

duplicates Elizabeth warrenton

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. username 1 (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elizabeth "Izzy Bell" Warrenton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lacks evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. username 1 (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Wells[edit]

In case you were wondering where your article went I moved James Wells to James Wells (activist).

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Elizabeth "Izzy Bell" Warrenton. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth "Izzy Bell" Warrenton. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ghab valley[edit]

Updated DYK query On March 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ghab valley, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas J. Senn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Minimac (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that I removed the {{long}} template you added to Malcolm X. I invite you to join a discussion about the length of the article at Talk:Malcolm X#Article length. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian pound[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_pound

http://www.syria-online.net/%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%81%D8%A6%D8%A9-200-%D9%88-100%D9%88-50-%D9%84%D9%8A.html

can u upload the photos of the new Syrian Pounds ??? Bo yaser (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Wells (activist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article James Wells (activist), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Wells (activist) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Novaseminary (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]