User talk:Ketikoti0107

Ourbrokenchains, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ourbrokenchains! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Longhair\^talk 17:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ketikoti0107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The article being created is not spam/advertising and I have included reliable sources. The user name is not the same as the documentary name (i.e. the documentary name is Broken Chains. The username is ourbrokenchains). Given that this is a generic name, I don't see how this could be deemed promotional in any way.

Decline reason:

The username issue is now resolved. The draft is clearly intended to promote the film. As you don't say what edits you intend to make that are unrelated to your conflict of interest, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ketikoti0107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Ketikoti0107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

1. I receive no compensation for my contributions for this wikipedia article. 2. I understand that the original username implied a company/organization account. The account username has now been updated to remove this association. The draft article is not intended to promote the film as reviewer username 331dot implied, it is simply intended to describe the film's plot and background for public awareness (just as any other Wikipedia article does). I was in the process of editing the article to be more objective and remove any subjective or seemingly promotional language, but I am unable to make these edits because of my username block. 3. I expect to make future contributions not only to the draft documentary article I'm currently editing, but also other articles in the media and social justice space.

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

describe for public awareness is the definition of promotion. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ketikoti0107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Ketikoti0107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I disagree that 'public awareness' is the definition of promotion, as user Lavalizard101 suggested. "Promotion" is defined in the Oxford dictionary as 'activity that supports or provides active encouragement for the furtherance of a cause, venture, or aim', and I specifically mentioned in my earlier comment that the edits I was already making were being made to remove any subjective or seemingly promotional language. Wikipedia's mission is "to collect knowledge disseminated around the globe", presumably for the public to consume, so I don't understand why me mentioning that I want my article to be read by the public should cause any concern. My point was that the written material was being edited to present the facts of the film and its production process. I'm disappointed that this has been such a drawn out multi-day review process given I've already confirmed that the article is edited to remove any appearance of subjectivity, even though the original blocking of my account was due to the username issue anyway. Nevertheless, I once again confirm that the intent of the article is to present a purely objective description about a documentary film, which is in compliance with Wikipedia's Term & Conditions.

Decline reason:

You are confused. Your original block was for your username, yes, but this was only one small part of the reason you were blocked. As was clearly explained to you above, "the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy." You won't be unblocked to raise public awareness of your film. If this is your goal here, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 10:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ketikoti0107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Ketikoti0107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I believe the confusion is on all sides, and I apologize if I've caused anything to be unclear. I now understand that there were two issues originally: 1) the username issue - this was resolved days ago 2) the content issue and an appearance of promotional content. I have written now three times that I was removing any appearance of subjectivity in the edits and the article will fully comply with Wikipedia's terms and conditions. I feel like the editors have been quite rude in their discussions with me, when I have repeatedly said that "public awareness" in my first comment was perhaps misused if the editors deemed that phrase as synonymous with "promotion". Again, I have no intention of using the article for promotional purposes. I am writing about the film to contribute the the encyclopedia of knowledge about factual information. It is a fact that this documentary exists. There are tens of thousands of Wiki articles about films, and the article being edited is intended to follow the same format and goals as these articles. I once again assert that I have no commercial relationship to write this article or others, this article will not be used to promote the film, and the only goal of the article is to allow Wikipedia readers who are interested in factual, objective information about this documentary's production to find this information - just as they would for any of the other Wiki articles published about films. Further, I plan to contribute to future Wikis in the social justice and media space, which is my area of expertise. By unblocking, I promise to make positive contributions to the site in line with Wikipedia's mission and values. Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

Editor hasn't responded to unblock appeal responses for some time, so appears to have disengaged with this process. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The vast majority of articles on films are not written by the filmmakers. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information or merely telling of the existence of something, that is considered promotional. You don't have to gain financially to be promoting something. You may disagree with this, but the fact remains you will not be unblocked to edit about your film. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

You should be aware that Wikipedia does not include articles on a topic just because it exists. The topic must be notable by Wikipedia's definition. In the case of a film, it must pass Wikipedia's notability criteria for films to be considered worthy of inclusion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Copied from unblock hold template: not responded to by editor.In the spirit of clearing this from the queue: Ketikoti0107, you have a conflict of interest with Broken Chains, and really shouldn't be editing it in ether draft or in article mainspace. If the film is notable, someone else will no doubt write an article about it. You've indicated you would like to contribute to social justice and media articles. As a condition of unblocking, what would you say to a topic ban from Broken Chains and anything directly related to it? That way you could contribute elsewhere without invoking a conflict of interest. Note that this is just a suggestion - other admins may comment on the idea and/or disagree with it. @Longhair:, obviously your views welcome on this idea, as blocking admin. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Rename from "Ourbrokenchains" to "Ketikoti0107"

Rename from "Ourbrokenchains" to "Ketikoti0107" --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Broken Chains (documentary)

Hello, Ketikoti0107. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Broken Chains (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Broken Chains (documentary)

Hello, Ketikoti0107. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Broken Chains".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)