User talk:Kji7258

I am most appreciative of the constructive comments, suggestions and queries by the several editors/reviewers. Please permit me to make the following points.

1)working to submit material to Wikipedia has been a learning experience. Even though I have been an editor-in-chief of a major international textbook, getting familiar with many of the Wiki editing criteria has taken some time.

2)The use of another user name was completely accidental and completely unintended and I apologize for this error.

3)As to prior editing for Wiki, I call your attention to the Wikipedia article about my late colleague, Dr.Judah Folkman. Although I did not directly submit/edit the original article, having been invited to nominate him for a Nobel Prize, I provide that detailed biographical data about him and his achievements that became major portion of article accepted by Wikipedia.

4)Finally,given all the caveats thoughtfully provided by all of you, any future edits of this article will not be coming this source.

Thank you. KJI7258Kisselbacher (talk) 17:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Julius Isselbacher (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Julius Isselbacher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Revent^talk 17:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Kji7258, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reventtalk 17:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Julius Isselbacher has been accepted

Kurt Julius Isselbacher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 16:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I have had to remove a large section that was apparently duplicated from [1]. Please read and understand the various copyright issues involved with putting content into Wikipedia at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. Thanks. --j⚛e decker^talk 19:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kurt J. Isselbacher.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Kurt J. Isselbacher.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rotten regard 23:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Alternative account and possible COI

Hi Kji7258

It appears from this post made at the Wikipedia:Teahouse that you and user Kisselbacher might be the same person. If that is the case, then I highly suggest that you carefully read "Using multiple accounts". Creating alternative accounts is allowable under certain conditions on Wikipedia, but for the most part it not something considered to be acceptable. Regardless of whether your intentions were good, an alternative account can lead other editors to question your neutrality and ability to edit in good with others; In the worst case scenario, it could lead to accusations of sock puppetry.

Another potential problem is that from your contribution history, your account seems to have been created for a single purpose. All of your edits to date have been made to Kurt Julius Isselbacher. Although there's nothing wrong with focusing on a single Wikipedia article, it can lead other editors to question your motivation for editing; In other words, they may feel that you are only editing to push a certain point of view about a particular subject and not really here to build an encyclopedia. Once again, this can cause other to question your ability to maintain a neutral point of view

Finally, if you are indeed User:Kisselbacher and, thus, are the same "Kurt Julius Isselbacher" who is the subject of the article you've been editing, then there exists a conflict of interest between you and the subject. COI is something highly discouraged on Wikipedia, and it is really only considered acceptable under certain conditions. I strongly recommend that you carefully read through both Wikipedia's "Plain simple conflict of interest guide" and "Advice for editors who may have a conflict of interest". COI editors, especially those who edit articles about living persons, need to be very careful to try and stay as neutral as possible when editing. COI editors often assume that they are naturally granted some kind of editorial control over "their" articles because they know better than others (i.e., they are an expert) because of their close connection to the subject. However, they often find out, sometimes rather harshly, that the opposite is more often the case and that mainspace articles are not owned by anyone in particular, but rather are there for all to edit. The best thing to do in such cases is to be as transparent as possible about your COI and try to work in collaboration with other editors within Wikipedia's framework to ensure the article is constantly being improved; It's OK to make suggestions for improvements, but the heavy editing should be left to other editors. COI may be fine when you are working on a draft, but it is something you should try and avoid once that draft has been approved. Please read the pages I have linked above. If you have any questions, then please post them hear and I will try to answer them as best as I can. If you feel my post is unwarranted and want to hear what others think, then you can ask at WP:COIN or WP:BLPN, the Teahouse or add the template {{help me}} to your talk page. - Marchjuly (talk) 05:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Warning

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mike V • Talk 05:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kurt Julius Isselbacher

The article Kurt Julius Isselbacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to have a conflict of interest issue. The notability of the subject is not adequately established by independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 (talk) 17:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)