User talk:Mrom

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mrom, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 18:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:BrainstormLV.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrainstormLV.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:FourShores.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FourShores.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Brainstormsmall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brainstormsmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Brainstorm-latvian.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brainstorm-latvian.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...On the Radio (Remember the Days)[edit]

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article ...On the Radio (Remember the Days) are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 13:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:12 Herbert Gronemeyer.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:12 Herbert Gronemeyer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Home-MrChildren.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Home-MrChildren.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Tree and other U2 albums...[edit]

Hello there. THanks for your contribution to the Joshua Tree article. Do you have a reliable source for the 30million figure provided? What about other U2 albums? I ask firstly because (a) everything in wikipedia needs to be verified and secondly (b) we are looking for reliable and current sales figures for other U2 albums. Anyway, hope you can help. kind regards and happy editing. Merbabu 08:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, little mistake from my side. It's more than 25 not 30 million. Here is published all time album chart, where The Joshua tree is in 17th place. Here in Wikipedia is said, that Appetite for Destruction (16th place) has sold more than 25 mio copies, but Supernatural (20th place) - over 25 mio too. So we can see, that The Joshua Tree has sold 25-30 million copies worldwide. According to that site and Wikipedia, sales of Achtung Baby should be close to 20 millions. -- Mrom 13:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Number-one albums on the United World Chart. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nburden ^(T) 10:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:3DoorsDown-Loser.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:3DoorsDown-Loser.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's shot put[edit]

Hi. The list you added is not complete, I am missing at least Miran Vodovnik. Can you provide a source? Thanks. --Tone 16:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At first I added A group. B group, where is Vodovnik, I added later. :) --Mrom (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see :-) Huh, I didn't know this many athletes are competing. By the way, a source would still be appreciated, since the season and personal bests are not in the two present references. Cheers. --Tone 16:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will add it now! :) -- Mrom (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! By the way, when you have time, add the sources to the other disciplines, ok? Cheers. --Tone 17:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK! --Mrom (talk) 17:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar[edit]

For extra fast reaction (writing Māris Štrombergs) and other contributions to Latvia-related articles ~~**Xil** (talk) 11:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Latvian Airplay Top[edit]

I have nominated Latvian Airplay Top, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvian Airplay Top. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 12:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lists of number-one albums in the World[edit]

Template:Lists of number-one albums in the World has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoaningLisa.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MoaningLisa.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladislavs Gutkovskis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladislavs Gutkovskis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladislavs Gutkovskis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 16:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]