User talk:Ppyoonus

Mannarkkad Taluk

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mannarkkad Taluk, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Mannarkkad. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Darjeeling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Superk1a (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Darjeeling has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Metricopolus (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Darjeeling. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typeractive (talk • contribs) 06:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Your edits on Bangalore

Hi there I have reverted your addition of images on the Bangalore article assuming good faith. The reason being that Bangalore is a featured article and any such changes have to be discussed on the talk page and may be done if there is a clear consensus. — Abhishek  ^Talk 12:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Improper move of Kerala High Court

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Whpq (talk) 14:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I have fixed the improper move and created a new version of Malappuram Collectorate based on your previous contribution. Please feel free to edit that article.  Frank  |  talk  22:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School

Hello Poyoonus, You started Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School with a copy of the Indian Institute of Technology Madras article. At that time you did not provide the required attribution, see WP:PATT. You should already be aware of the need for attribution since you previously copied the Mannarkkad article in 2010.

For several days you have added and removed material. The result is, to me, a confusing mixture of material where some applies only to the school, some is not about the school at all and some may or may not be about the school. For example there is material that talks about IIT and is unchanged from when it was copied. It's not clear if this is material unrelated to the school that should be removed or material that somehow was about the institute but also applies to the school. The Notable alumni section says it's main article is List of Indian Institute of Technology Madras alumni and I suspect few if any of those listed are alumi of Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School.

Additonally you have added material to a History & Background section without citing any sources. All Wikipedia content must be based on published sources and you need to identify those sources to the reader for verification.

Please take the time to address these issues. Gab4gab (talk) 16:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Gab4gab and Ppyoonus:

• It seems that, Even Devadhar was created using Indian Institute of Technology Madras as a template and all the contents remains as it is. Probably this was to finally create the page Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School
• So I am tagging Devadhar for csd while assuming it was a test page. Sureshkhole (talk) 22:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello again Ppyoonus, I've cleaned up the article some. It's now clearer that very little of the material that remains is supported by citations. Searching I found a list of schools that seems to include this one so I've added a reference to that. You don't seem to be editing for now. If you don't return soon to provide references to published sources I'll remove additional unsourced content. Gab4gab (talk) 19:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devadhar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Devadhar, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Devadhar Government Higher Secondary School, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sureshkhole (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ppyoonus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)