User talk:Punanimal
Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Additional tips[edit]
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
- Find everything in the Directory.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- Introduce yourself at the new user log.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
- If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
- To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
- Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Be Bold!![edit]
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round. 
Joe I 02:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
References for The Holocaust[edit]
Thank you for supplying the references so quickly. I have edited them to work with the system for populating the Notes section in use on that page. If you have any questions about what I have done, please contact me on my talk page. -- Donald Albury 22:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Occitan[edit]
Occitan is not the source for English OK. Please don't spread nonsense, doing so may be considered vandalism. CRCulver 22:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- I apologise. It's just that, having studied Occitan for many years, I had never heard of it being a source for English "okay". But now I've seen the WP article here (and fleshed it out a bit), so I understand now that this view exists. CRCulver 16:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the note. There are a couple of worrying things about the article for me. The first being that the article is largely unsourced, and that it even says that it is based at least in part on the personal experiences of one or more editors. Reporting that sort of experience is proscribed by WP:No original research. If it weren't, I guarantee the Chinese martial arts articles would be a lot more interesting! The second thing (and what led to my thought that is seemd a bit adverty) is prose like: "Kateda's intense focus on breathing and..." where a descriptor like intense is a bit much for an encyclopaedia article, which language tends to be drier. There is a lot of that in the article, and it stands out to my eye as out of place. I'm glad there is a controversies section, but a problem is that it seems also to be largely unsourced, and even has some speculation which we also should avoid. I haven't done any research on the subject myself (which is why I haven't done any copy editing) but these were my impressions on being asked to look at the article. I hope this helps, drop me a line any time. --Fire Star 火星 16:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your note on my talk page... I don't know what edits you're talking about. My edits on the Kateda article have all involved fixing typos and removing non-notable references. I haven't added any material. —Erik Harris 13:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
As someone who contributed to the Seichim article, I'd very much appreciate your views here Talk:Reiki#Merger_proposal_for_Seichim_into_here. Sticky Parkin 01:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seichim -as you are the article's creator, I thought I would let you know. Sticky Parkin 00:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Kateda[edit]
I have nominated Kateda, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kateda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Janggeom (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Financial astrology for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Financial astrology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial astrology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chillum 03:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)