User talk:Revery~enwiki

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Present artistic elite of the US. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Wickethewok 19:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Wickethewok, the admin, the new page patroller, exaggerated a bit. As a user from Europe, I had an idea: To create pages which would give overviews of contemporary artistic elites in every single country. I guess such pages would be interesting and Wickethewok, who himself does showbiz stuff, knows that very well. I was an unexperienced Wikipedia user back then, just starting. Anyway, the English version is not my base. I still believe that such a project would make sense.--Revery (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Kazimierz Gustaw Zemła"

A page you created, Kazimierz Gustaw Zemła, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. JaGa^talk 20:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marek Krajewski

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marek Krajewski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Although a published author, doesn't appear to pass WP:BIO / WP:CREATIVE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 11:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I examined the situation a little more carefully, and I disagree with the previous author. The article stays. DS (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Revery! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Marek Krajewski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Joanna Olczak-Roniker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Wojciech Kuczok - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Jarosław Marek Rymkiewicz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Wiesław Myśliwski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Stefan Chwin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Revery. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Revery~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)