User talk:Rubenstein Neil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Rubenstein Neil, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Rubenstein Neil! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Callanecc (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

HI Rubenstein Neal, sorry about that. I have no problem with the article as is, however as the {{Computer Systems Institute|namespace]] is protected I am in the process of having the protection reviewed. Callanecc (talk) 01:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

"The content of the submitted page is in essence the same as that deleted five times by five different admins (and obviously the nominators for CSD took a similar view. The article basically says "this is what we are selling... this is how we are accredited to do that.." — nothing about the company itself other that who founded it, and where its HQ is. There is no real history, and since it doesn't give basic facts like number of employees, number of students, turnover or profits, I'm not sure that it even demonstrates notability. To me, it's just a sales pitch"

Once the above points are addressed in the aricle let me know (via my talk page) and I'll have a look.Callanecc (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed (I hope) all the issues regarding the article you previously reviewed. I added a lot more statistics and sections covering financial aid & tuition along with statistics around student life. Please let me know your thoughts at this point. Rubenstein Neil (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the article addresses more about the Institute itself rather than what it provides, so well done - a good start. I think including the total number of students (rather than just the statistics) as well as how many are in each year would add to the article. I would also suggest (if you haven't already) looking at similar pages (for similar institutions) on Wikipedia and having a look at the information included on those pages (such as notable alumni). There are also sections of the article which would be better as prose rather than a list but that is something which can be fixed after a possible move into mainspace. Callanecc (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are the next steps then? Is the article ready to be considered for the mainspace? fyi, I do have the total number of students in the Infobox. Thanks again Rubenstein Neil (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry missed that. I've asked the admin who protected the page in mainspace to have a look. Just need to wait and see what he thinks. Callanecc (talk) 01:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Computer Systems Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Callanecc (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Rubenstein Neil. You have new messages at Callanecc's talk page.
Message added 12:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Callanecc (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Computer Systems Institute logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Computer Systems Institute logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]