User talk:Senthilrockz

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Senthilrockz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Secret of success (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Erode, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

It is not usually a good idea to reinstate a large chunk of an old article version, as you have done, without discussing it first. In this instance, much of the content was either unsourced or poorly sourced and there were various other issues also. Sitush (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Dear Sitush - You should first cross check the article i have inserted and the present one reverted by you. Read the whole article clearly and then give me your explanation. Somebody has dleted lots of important informations in this "ERODE" page currently in the past 2 months including the topics of 1) Schools list, 2) Arts and Science Institutions, 3) Engineering and Technology, 4) Livestocks, 5) Print and Electronic Media, 6) Municipalities sorrounding Erode, 7) Retail, 8) Economy, 9) Road. All these topics and their story were completely deleted or partly deleted. Being a Citizen of Erode for the past 30 years, i know the whole History of Erode. Thatswhy i rerverted back all those unnecessary deletions and modifications. Now i am going to attach all the references and citing sources and then revert it back to get all those deleted details. Good day.

Much of the information relates to the district rather than the city. Much of it is unsourced. Much of it is poorly sourced. Some is very poorly written. I explained all this in the edit summaries to my original removals. If you wish to discuss further (I have reverted you again) then please do so at Talk:Erode. - Sitush (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sitush - You should first cross check the article i have inserted and the present one reverted by you. Read the whole article clearly and then give me your explanation. Somebody has dleted lots of important informations in this "ERODE" page currently in the past 2 months including the topics of 1) Schools list, 2) Arts and Science Institutions, 3) Engineering and Technology, 4) Livestocks, 5) Print and Electronic Media, 6) Municipalities sorrounding Erode, 7) Retail, 8) Economy, 9) Road. All these topics and their story were completely deleted or partly deleted. Being a Citizen of Erode for the past 30 years, i know the whole History of Erode. Thatswhy i rerverted back all those unnecessary deletions and modifications. Now i am going to attach all the references and citing sources and then revert it back to get all those deleted details. Nothing is poorly sourced in this article, actually i am trying to make this article fully rich with true sources. EXAMPLE - I have written a list of 18 schools which are situated in erode city. You kept only 5 schools in that topic. Explain me why did you removed other 13 schools. What do you know about ERODE. You should refer this website - http://www.tamilnaduschools.co.in/erode/schools-list-1.html and learn how many schools are there in ERODE. Note - Im trying to insert the references and sources for all the details one by one. So don't revert back my changes immediately without knowing anything. And i am trying to put my efforts honestly, so don't test my patience. The moment you entered this page "Erode" on 6th June 2012, you deleted all the valuable informations about Erode.

Please give me explanation for the above said EXAMPLE.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Erode with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 10:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solarra - Give me explanation for deleting 10,887 words from the page "ERODE". I findout that you are same person "Sitush" who is operating both user names sitush and solarra.

If you do not get the information at Erode sourced quickly, as per your message on my talk page, I will be removing it once more. A lot will be removed anyway because it does not relate to the city. Please also note that websites such as Facebook are not reliable sources. and that the burden is on you to substantiate the statements that you have made.

You have also incorrectly removed a lot of valid maintenance templates without first fixing the problems; for example, those requesting cittations. This is wrong.

Finally, you have been edit warring with two other people and are at the limit of the community's tolerance. I shall insert a formal warning below that explains what will happen should you reinstate this poor content once more. Oh, and you have rather rashly accused people of sockpuppetry in your message ~~below~~ above to Solarra - please assume good faith in your dealings with people. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - Sitush (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Senthilrockz. You have new messages at Solarra's talk page.
Message added 11:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 11:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for inappropriate reasons is not allowed. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]