User talk:Shatner1

AfD nomination of Brownmark Films

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brownmark Films, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownmark Films. Thank you. SERSeanCrane (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Each relisting generally goes for 5 days, same as the original, though an admin can close the debate early for various reasons. I doubt there will be a fourth relisting, so you will know in a day or two what the ultimate fate of the article will be. Regards, Resolute 21:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Throne

Indeed I was shocked there was no article on the important subject of Glorified rice. It's a grossly neglected area of encyclopedic inquiry I'm afraid. There are no articles here on seven-layer salad, salad pie or many of the other delicacies of the Scandahooligan (also not an article) nation of the Midwest. I may be punished some day for including an uffda reference in one of those articles, but it was worth it. I doubt I used it right though...

1) Unless you're just copy-editing, you're never supposed to change or delete any comments. You can strike your comments by typing <s>don't strike me!</s>Of course the <s> won't show up, but I'm showing you how it's done.

2) There seems to be some difference of opinion on whether your new vote should go right below your old one or at the bottom. I prefer the bottom because as the discussion evolves I want it indicated that my new vote is a product of that discussion. Just so you know, people tend type !vote instead of vote, since it's not really a "vote", in theory, but an indication based on judgements that is part of a debate. The person who "closes" the debate can weigh the arguments and doesn't have to count votes. Is this more than you ever wanted to know?

3) I try to boycott WikiSpeak in favor of plain English (although sometimes my English ain't so plain). There is a robust use of acronyms and wikiterminology here.

3)If you didn't already know, if you put "wp:" and then what topic you're looking for in the search box you can find policy article pages. So wp: notability, wp: photos, wp: references are examples. Also if you hit the search button instead of pressing <enter> or hitting the go button it searches instead of looking up the exact word. Maybe that's obvious, but I didn't realize it and it's helpful since a difference in spelling or capitalization or terminology can draw a blank.

4)I'm very happy to be appreciated for my tireless work promoting Glorified rice, but that pales in comparison to my heroic contribution to saving List of dodgeball variations, Languages in Star Wars and List of alleged UFO-related entities (which has been carved up considerably so you'll have to look at a version in the history to see it in all its glory). My latest effort in insanity is candies. Also can you get any Polish friends you have to weigh in on the heated debate at the Kishka article? I tried to invoke Solomon's law, but to no avail. Vaya con Dios. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Update

Ah, I see that in fact I voted twice on that subject. My bad. I struck my original conclusion. Thank you for pointing out my oversight. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Are you familiar with Snickers salad? I'd really like to do an article on it, but it's not in the Lutheran cookbook I have. I'm also concerned it's so implausible that it will be taken as hoax and deleted. Then of course there will be the challenge of finding good sources covering the subject so the article demonstrates notability and be verified. Uffda. Such are the challenges of encyclopedia building. Any thoughts?ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Apparently snickers salad isn't as widespread as I was lead to believe. I'm sure it will catch on soon... I wrote up the Pistachio salad article only to discover there is already a Watergate salad that seems to be similar.

You're welcome to Seven-layer salad. I'm not very familiar with it, but I think it's awesome. Try to find some sources for it first. You can definitely use the Lutheran cookbook I used for Glorified rice (it's in there along with several other layers of salad), but you'll need more than that as a source I'm afraid.

As you've contributed articles on movie related subjects, I wonder if you've seen Kitchen Stories? Elling (don't spoil it if you haven't seen it! It's awesome)? or The Art of Negative Thinking (a small film but if you like dark humor it's a kick in the ass)? I think you will appreciate them. As a New Yorker, the lack of dialog and action in Kitchen stories was painful to behold. I tell my Norwegian friends that I'm sure the movie will be made into a sequel because there is so much more to be left unsaid... How many Dala horses do you have? Oh and this might make you smile: Ole and LenaChildofMidnight (talk) 01:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Don't get too discouraged if anything gets deleted. You can always recreate if there is new news coverage on the subject (or you uncover artices you weren't aware of). The sources don't have to be available online by the way. Also, if you want anything that's deleted, just ask the editor who closes the discussion to save it to your userspace so you can "work on it". That way you don't have to start from scratch. Basically, if there aren't a couple of good sources, it's tough to save an article. Let me know what you think of Kitchen Stories. Elling is better. Take care. 04:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Snickers salad

The Seven-layer salad article is terrific. It warms my heart. A photo and more additions are on the way. I put part of an article I found on the article's talk page, as I don't have time to sort through what else can be added right now. Maybe Brownmark will make a Seven-layer salad movie? I noticed the article claims it's a Southern dish, which i find a little outrageous. The confederacy is always trying to steal Yankee glory. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your support

Unfortunately, my RFA was closed recently with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to Schmidt, MICHAEL Q., TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — talk

Orphaned non-free image File:COLLAPSE Poster small 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:COLLAPSE Poster small 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Green Gallery (Milwaukee)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Green Gallery (Milwaukee), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Gallery (Milwaukee). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 00:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephanie Barber

A tag has been placed on Stephanie Barber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vinithehat (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Fellow Traveler

Nice to see you in the real world of Milwaukee! Jgmikulay (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hamlet-on-blue.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hamlet-on-blue.jpg, which you've sourced to Image of Hamlet from the film. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 14:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Poliça

Hi Shatner1,

Thanks for your edits to Poliça (and Gayngs also!). You added the pronounciation of the band's name to the article, but I had to take it out again. Are you familiar with WP:IPA? It's a guide to write out sounds. If you look up France, you see this: (English: /ˈfræns/ ^ⓘ franss or /ˈfrɑːns/ frahnss; which helps to pronounce it correctly. Now I'm not saying you should do it just like that, but writing it like you did earlier isn't exactly clear to an American, a South African or a Scot (or for a person whose English is a second language, like me!). Anyway, thanks and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 16:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Solid Gold (band)

Hi, I'm GenQuest. Shatner1, thanks for creating Solid Gold (band)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Tag for article needs

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shatner1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shatner1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shatner1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Game (1984 film)

The article The Game (1984 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notable actors, no citations, no independent reviews to be found other than on personal blogs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:David-Robbins-Talent-WEB.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:David-Robbins-Talent-WEB.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Samwell Heart-Mouth.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Samwell Heart-Mouth.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Modus operandi web.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Modus operandi web.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)