User talk:Trueblue74

Aso Oke Hat[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aso Oke Hat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Endless Dan 14:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Senegalese kaftan.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Senegalese kaftan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Indian Muslim.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Indian Muslim.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a {{cc-by-2.0}} tag and restored the image to the article. When using images from Flickr please remember to check the copyright link (it usually says "some rights reserved" or something similar) and use one of the tags at [[1]] --Enric Naval (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a bunch of images you uploaded. To name a few examples, the UN material is copyrighted. Flickr images are only allowed when released under a creative commons license. The images you uploaded states "all rights reserved" which means they can not be used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Copyrights for more information. Garion96 (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again you uploaded Image:Benin Wedding.jpg which I deleted again. The image is from flickr, but it is NOT released under a creative commons license therefore you uploaded a copyright violation. Do not upload anymore copyright violations and please read the links in my message above. Uploading copyright violations is a fast way to be getting blocked indefinitely. Garion96 (talk) 12:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bernie Grant.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bernie Grant.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Book berniegrant.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Book berniegrant.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop[edit]

Please stop removing the Bob Wood dashiki photo. This is an insult to all that care about African-American culture. OddibeKerfeld (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Butch and femme, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gimme danger (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Thanks for the heads up User:Gimme danger. Would you please take the red highlights off my edit, and place the term in quotes. Good day. Trueblue74

Final warning[edit]

I saw that you uploaded File:Traditional Dashiki Shirt.jpg. As you look at the source site at flickr [2] it clearly states that this image is released under a non-commercial license which can not be uploaded to Wikipedia. You already have been warned for this, if you upload another copyvio you will be blocked indefinitely. Garion96 (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Wood[edit]

WoodAlabama.JPG[edit]

The photo Image:WoodAlabama.JPG has been deleted from the dashiki article because the image is of Wood wearing a jacket. The garment in question is not a dashiki. A dashiki is a shirt. I am begging you to stop vandalizing the dashiki article. Many individuals here at wikipedia have spent hours, days, and years trying to maintain the article. We have many racists who vandalize it, and you keep doing so. I am assuming that you are not a racist. I explained to you that Bob Wood is wearing a mudcloth jacket. The garment he is wearing is NOT a dashiki. Please do not upload this photo again. Please take a photo of him in a dashiki, and I will leave it in the article. It will not be deleted. A dashiki is a shirt, not a jacket. Asante. Thank you. Trueblue74 (talk)

I didn't know the Bob Wood photo was a mud clothe jacket and not a dashiki. I'm not vandalism anything! I'm not sure why you brought race into the discussion either or flirted with calling me a racist. What's the cause of that? I think you are rude and need to learn some manners. Bugger off! OddibeKerfeld (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this late response. I must have missed your message. It seems to be solved already. Be carful with accusing of vandalism though, this was just an honest mistake. Garion96 (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Heraldry in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 14:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:American in Kufi.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American in Kufi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heraldry in Sub-Saharan Africa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heraldry in Sub-Saharan Africa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heraldry in Sub-Saharan Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]