User talk:Trust reputation

Speedy deletion of "Implicit collaboration"[edit]

A page you created, Implicit collaboration, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Ndenison ^talk 14:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy delete tags. Ndenison ^talk 14:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Implicit collaboration has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ndenison ^talk 14:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. DougsTech (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Implicit collaboration constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Ndenison ^talk 14:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Implicit collaboration. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Washburnmav (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're removing the speedy delete tag, thats vandalism. Ndenison ^talk 14:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When adding {{hangon}} tags to pages, please do not deleted the speedy delete tag ({{db-g1}}). Thanks Washburnmav (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Implicit collaboration[edit]

Please join the discussion on the article's talk page. This is where you defend your position to keep it, not on the article space. As long as the {{hangon}} tag is there, the article should be left alone. Thanks, Ndenison ^talk 14:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Computational trust"[edit]

A page you created, Computational trust, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Washburnmav (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Trust reputation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS for the welcome. I will read the suggested articles on how to properly write wikipedia's contributions.

cheers :-)

Luca

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, So administrator have the final decision about a page. Ok, I'm going to add more information about the following articles: implicit collaboration computational trust.

thanks again Luca

I'll help you out[edit]

Sorry about the "all out attack" on your pages. I think we might have jumped the gun, as what you are adding is useful information. I'll work on cleaning up your pages a little bit. In the meantime, please read WP:VERIFY and WP:NOR. If you have any questions, feel free to post on my talk page. Ndenison ^talk 15:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add... please look at WP:CITE and Wikipedia:No original research to help with your page. Wikieditor06 (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, look at how I formatted the references on Computational trust, and please fix anything that I may have messed up. This page might help you out with this - WP:CITET. One last thing, on talk pages, you should sign your posts with ~~~~. Thanks again. Ndenison ^talk 15:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(And sorry I was a little redundant that last post... Ndenison beat me :) Wikieditor06 (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys.

Don't worry about your attacks. This means that wikipedia is a real project, with expert people behind who manage its content. So I'm more than happy that you attacked me before. Sorry about my english as I'm not a native english speaker. About the "Implicit collaboration": it's really a very new field of research and i don't have real references as my paper are not published yet about this topis. I will add as soon as possible. If you are english speaker, I'll be happy if sometimes you will check my contributions.

Proposed deletion of Computational trust[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Computational trust, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ndenison ^talk 16:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Implicit collaboration[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Implicit collaboration, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ndenison ^talk 16:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi All. As you can see I improved the Computational trust Page and I'm going to improve also the Implicit collaboration one. Sorry about that, but i had no time to do that and I won't have to much time to improve those pages over the next days/week. I hope you will not delete these 2 pages.

Luca

January 2016[edit]

Your addition to Computational trust has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Trust reputation. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Implicit collaboration[edit]

The article Implicit collaboration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: an article on non-notable topic possibly consisting entirely of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Implicit collaboration for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Implicit collaboration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Implicit collaboration (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]