User talk:VaChiliman

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome. Thanks, SqueakBox talk 05:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources[edit]

I suppose this is best for me to ruminate over Reliable Sources at my own talk page, and perhaps limit my discussion elsewhere. VaChiliman (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^[1]Gramma International, English Edition

English language edition of the newspaper of Cuba's Communist Party

discussion

From this US American POV, free speech notwithstanding, it seems to me that this particular source would not normally be considered a relaible source, except about itself. News contained therein pertaining to the Communist Party in Cuba, its policies, and its positions, would be acceptable for inclusion. Could it be used as a source for facts, inside or outside Cuba? VaChiliman (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^[2]Agencia Bolivariana de Noticias

Descibed as the national news agency of Venezuela^[3].

discussion

This would seem to be an unreliable source, in part because it would appear to not be independent of the Venezuelan government, could be prone to publish unsupported (mis)information, and in part because it publishes in another language, and requires translation. Relaibility could be contextual, and I would be especially sensitive to the reporting of facts that may be supressed or filtered by other "higher quality" sources and indeed be truthful. My question is can it ever be used as a source, even about the Venezuelan government, other than as a publisher of official notice or proclamation. VaChiliman (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^[4]La Nueva Televisora del Sur

Descibed as a pan-Latin American terrestrial and satellite television network headquartered in Caracas, Venezuela^[5]

discussion

My take is this: if you proclaim to be a counterbalance, and you function as a biased counterweight to media bias from other sources, you cannot be deemed a reliable source. Is that reasonable, and in what context? I am speaking strictly from using as a Wikipedia source, under which policy, it seems, truth is not a question, and verification is inportant (that is also to say, "original research" has no value, no matter how accurate or truthful, or well-indended). VaChiliman (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Comments

From a personal standpoint, I would want to read and or see the news from alternative sources, and be able to filter out the noise, bias, etc. for myself. Am I correct in understanding that is not what Wikipedia is about; that is to say, it is not a news, or opinion, catalog. If that were so, it would seem to me that most articles concerning topics open to multiple POV would be shorter, and more concise, than they appear to be. I know its a work in progress, but the so-called "Honduras Coup" article is a classic example of a page out of control. My apologies in advance to those who find offense -- I don't mean that comment to be directed toward any one person or their good faith efforts; my expectation might be shorter article(s), and robust (though more respectful) discussion. VaChiliman (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honduras[edit]

Hello, you seem to be part of the dispute with the 2009 Honduran coup d'état/constitutional crisis, please take part in mediation discussions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/2009_Honduran_coup_d'état --Conor Fallon (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted[edit]

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/2009 Honduran coup.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Hello[edit]

Just thought I'd say "hello" somewhere less public than on the talk page of the Honduras crisis article. I've been involved in Honduras for about 3 decades, doing historical and archaeological research in the country nearly every year. Most of my work has been in the north and west (eg, departments of Cortés, Santa Barbara, Yoro, Atlantida, and Comayagua). I spent most of June this year in Honduras, leaving 2 days before the coup (of which it was common knowledge that it was to have been the 25th). In theory I head back to Honduras this Saturday (having postponed my return for a week already), but in practice, who knows.

The medical missions are something that I know is valuable, and valued in Honduras. BTW, Micheletti sent back the 400 Cuban doctors that were providing service in rural clinics. Rsheptak (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation request[edit]

Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thanks you, GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 02:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html

[2] ttp://www.abn.info.ve/

[3] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agencia_Bolivariana_de_Noticias

[4] ttp://www.telesurtv.net/

[5] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeleSUR

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]