User talk:Vleermuisman

Hello, Vleermuisman, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Ely Jacques Kahn

Hi. I'm afraid that I reverted (i.e. deleted) the material you added to this article. In looking at the single source it is based I, I found numerous instances where material had been taken directly from that article, and others in which the paraphrasing was too close for comfort. Please read WP:COPYVIO for Wikipedia's policies on copyright violation, which we take very seriously. The executive summary is that you can never simply copy-and-paste from another website unless it is a short direct quote, which must be properly attributed. You're more than welcome to take any ideas from the other site, but the expression of those ideas in our article must be new and novel, meaning that you must write the information in your own words. Shuffling around directly-copied phrases from one sentence to another is not sufficient, it's got to be a new expression of the concept.

You are welcome to reinstate the material I deleted, but only in a re-written form that doesn't violate our policies. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Same with Raymond Hood. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Daily News Building too, although it's not as bad. Try not to lift words like "dichtomizing", they're a dead giveaway. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Verbal Language in Dreams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Verbal language in dreams

Congratulations on having your article accepted for creation. Here are a couple of notes:

• Please remember that Wikipedia is not an academic resource, it's a popular encyclopedia. Your article is a little too much like an academic paper, and could use some adjustments in both tone and content to be more accesible to the general public.

• Wikistyle is for capitalization of section titles is for only the first word of the section title to be capitatized, except for proper nouns.

• Please add Wikilinks to other articles where appropriate, such as I've added to "Hebrew Bible", "The Odyssey", "Proust" and "Swann's Way". There are many others in the article that still need to be done. Such hyperlinks are part of the reason Wikipedia is such a useful and popular resource.

• Please don't use "op. cit." and "ibid" in Wikipedia references. This is because anyone can edit an article, and the order of the material may change. The best thing to do is to put a often-used source into the "Bibliography" and then cite it. I've done this for you with Heynick (1993).

• Which brings me to a concern: the article seems to be very strongly based on the work of one academic, Frank Heynick: the great of references cite him. You should try to expand the article to include the work of other experts in the field.

• Which also prompts me to ask: do you have any relationship with Frank Heynick. if so, please read WP:COI.

That's all I have for the moment, since my time is short. When I have more free time I'll take another pass at it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mini-Gotham (Model City).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 16:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mini-Gotham (Model City) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mini-Gotham (Model City), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mini-Gotham (Model City)

Hello Vleermuisman. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mini-Gotham (Model City)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mini-Gotham (Model City)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mini-Gotham Hoover Building (view b).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mini-Gotham Hoover Building (view b).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mini-Gothaam Hoover Building.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mini-Gothaam Hoover Building.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mini-Gotham Boots Building.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mini-Gotham Boots Building.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mini-Gotham Theater District Building (view b).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mini-Gotham Theater District Building (view b).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mini-Gotham Theater District Building.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mini-Gotham Theater District Building.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Mini-Gotham Elevated Line (view d).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mini-Gotham Elevated Line (view d).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:Mini gotham Boots Building (view c).jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vleermuisman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Verbal language in dreams

The article Verbal language in dreams has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)