User talk:Wcrea6
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi Wcrea6! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:47, Saturday, June 10, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi Wcrea6! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:28, Friday, June 16, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Wcrea6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —PaleoNeonate – 22:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
16-MAY-2018[edit]
Hello Wcrea6, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Group selection have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. .spintendo⋅⋅) 06:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you have made substantial edits to Group selection, without always making clear which claim came from which source. The effect has been to loosen the structure of a fully-cited article, not exactly a desirable direction of travel. I have accordingly marked up three 'citation needed' points in the text. I note also that the new text is in places more contentious than the carefully encyclopedic text that it replaces; I considered a full revert but have decided to hold off for now. I would be grateful if you could copy-edit your additions, considering carefully if each claim or implication is fully justified by the source(s) it is cited to. The uncited sentences should either be removed or be cited to sources which again fully cover the claims made. Any claims that represent your personal opinion rather than a cited source are not allowed. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Because these were primarily addressed to you personally, of course. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to have to come back to you on this one. I have put a detailed statement on the article's talk page, but I thought it would be helpful to say a couple of things here. Firstly, on such a sensitive and controversial topic in a science article, we must stick very closely to the best sources. That means taking great care not to slip into taking one side or another, whether by following popular sources such as books for the general public, or more subtly by following and citing primary research papers which (naturally) state one side of the argument. Secondly, the overwhelming opinion among evolutionary biologists is that group selection is at best very unlikely, given that it can be undermined by 'cheating' at any lower level, and at worst tantamount to pseudoscience (at which point a whole lot more Wikipedia policies come into play). So, I'd ask for extreme care. It's a specialist matter, and superficial use of references isn't acceptable. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Group selection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Washington Area Secular Humanists thumbnail logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Washington Area Secular Humanists thumbnail logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)